This is a decommissioned version of ERA which is running to enable completion of migration processes. All new collections and items and all edits to existing items should go to our new ERA instance at https://ualberta.scholaris.ca - Please contact us at erahelp@ualberta.ca for assistance!
Search
Skip to Search Results- 101Toolkit for Grant Success
- 72Toolkit for Grant Success/Educational Materials (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 24Toolkit for Grant Success/Agency Resources (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 2Toolkit for Grant Success/Metrics (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 2Toolkit for Grant Success/Successful Grants (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 1Toolkit for Grant Success/Communications (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 28CIHR
- 15Simala, Joanne
- 10Simala-Grant, Joanne
- 5Grant Assist Program
- 4Angela McCormick
- 4Dr. Joanne Simala-Grant
-
In-kind Contributions - Examples
2023-01-03
The purpose of this document is to provide ideas for researchers about some potential in-kind contributions that may be included in a research project proposal. This is not an exhaustive list. This is also not a formal policy document and every item, their eligibility and valuation should be...
-
2016-09-23
Simala-Grant, Joanne - Director, Health Funding Research Initiatives
This document outlines the criteria to be used by CIHR reviewers for Stage 1 Foundation applications, and may be used when assessing Stage 1 applications for internal review.
-
2016-09-11
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
Outlined in this document is a summary of the most common strengths listed in by CIHR reviewers in feedback received by University of Alberta applicants to the Stage 2 Foundation 2014 competition. Analysis was performed on 53 reviews of 11 applications. Four of the applications analyzed were...
-
2016-09-11
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
Outlined in this document is a summary of the most common weaknesses listed by CIHR reviewers in feedback received by University of Alberta applicants to the Stage 2 Foundation 2014 competition. Analysis was performed on 53 reviews of 11 applications. Four of the applications analyzed were...