Systems biology and the integration of mechanistic explanation and mathematical explanation

• Author(s) / Creator(s)

  • Brigandt, Ingo

• The paper discusses how systems biology is working toward complex accounts that integrate explanation in terms of mechanisms and explanation by mathematical models—which some philosophers have viewed as rival models of explanation. Systems biology is an integrative approach, and it strongly relies on mathematical modeling. Philosophical accounts of mechanisms capture integrative in the sense of multilevel and multifield explanations, yet accounts of mechanistic explanation (as the analysis of a whole in terms of its structural parts and their qualitative interactions) have failed to address how a mathematical model could contribute to such explanations. I discuss how mathematical equations can be explanatorily relevant. Several cases from systems biology are discussed to illustrate the interplay between mechanistic research and mathematical modeling, and I point to questions about qualitative phenomena (rather than the explanation of quantitative details), where quantitative models are still indispensable to the explanation. Systems biology shows that a broader philosophical conception of mechanisms is needed, which takes into account functional-dynamical aspects, interaction in complex networks with feedback loops, system-wide functional properties such as distributed functionality and robustness, and a mechanism’s ability to respond to perturbations (beyond its actual operation). I offer general conclusions for philosophical accounts of explanation.

• Date created

  2013

• Subjects / Keywords

  • Systems Biology
  • Mechanisms
  • Integration
  • Mathematical Models
  • Mechanistic Explanation

• Type of Item

  Article (Published)

• DOI

  https://doi.org/10.7939/R3P26QJ1C

• License

  © 2013 I. Brigandt et al. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.