Usage
  • 236 views
  • 928 downloads

Addressing the Challenges of Applying Machine Learning for Predicting Mental Disorders and Their Prognosis Using Two Case Studies

  • Author / Creator
    Ghoreishiamiri, Seyedehreyhaneh
  • One of the principal applications of machine learning in psychiatry is to build automated tools that can help clinicians predict the diagnosis and prognosis of mental disorders using available data from patients’ profiles. Here, in two different studies, we investigate ways to use machine learn- ing to produce models that can predict mental disorders and their prognosis, using different neuroimaging modalities, genotype data, and clinical information.The first study addresses the challenge of producing a classifier that a human clinician can interpret and potentially use in clinical practice. In this study, we were seeking a simple and accurate classifier that can correctly distinguish Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients from healthy controls (HC). We wanted to learn this classifier from the data in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, using just a fairly small set of input features, including grey matter volumes of 33 regions of interest derived from brain structural MRI, as well as the APOE genotype. Running our overall learner, involving standard feature selection processes and three simple base-learners on these features, produced a 7-feature elastic net model that achieved an accuracy of 89.28% on the test set. Next, we ran the same overall learner using two more-complex base-learners over the same initial dataset. The accuracy of the best model here (SVM-RBF over 23 features) was 90.47%, which was not statistically different from the performance of our much simpler linear model, over just 7 features. We, therefore, introduce this simple 7-feature model as our accurate and simple classification model.Our second study explored the utility of machine learning methods in predicting the response of a group of schizophrenia patients (n=51 to 90, depending on the response criterion) to a specific treatment, given their functional magnetic resonance imaging data, structural magnetic resonance imaging data, diffusion tensor imaging data, and clinical information. In this study, we explored various clinical measures for defining treatment response, various feature types for imaging and non-imaging data, various machine learning tasks and learning algorithms, but (probably due to the small sample size), we were not able to obtain any significant results.

  • Subjects / Keywords
  • Graduation date
    Spring 2019
  • Type of Item
    Thesis
  • Degree
    Master of Science
  • DOI
    https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-agks-3v66
  • License
    Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.