Usage
  • 552 views
  • 688 downloads

Systems of Inequity: Representations of Immigrants, Refugees, and Newcomers in Canada's National Housing Strategy

  • Author / Creator
    Bell, Jennifer
  • Housing insecurity and homelessness in Canada have significant implications in the lived experiences of people. It is estimated that on any given night in Canada, approximately 35,000 people experience homelessness; further, estimates of 235,000 people experience homelessness in a given year (Gaetz, Dej, Richter & Redman, 2016). In addition, it has been estimated that 1.5 million people in Canada do not meet stable housing requirements. These estimates of housing insecurity and homelessness are impacted by myriad factors including economics, accessibility, politics, race and historical implications; conversely, housing directly influences many other social determinants including, health, access to services and social inclusion. Research has demonstrated that immigrants, refugees, and newcomers to Canada often find themselves in precarious housing circumstances. This precarity is magnified for a variety of reasons such as immigration status, access to social services, employment security, and discrimination.
    Another factor, which directly influences housing security and homelessness are current political climates. In this case, the most recent federal government promised and delivered on commitments to establish a National Housing Strategy (NHS). The purpose of housing strategies are to provide plans, goals, and financial commitments to addressing housing issues. Because housing is embedded in larger contextual milieus, it is critical to examine how individuals and circumstances are addressed in federal policies such as the National Housing Strategy (NHS).
    Research that addresses the complex experiences of immigrants, refugees, and newcomers can help to create policies that are inclusive. The purpose of this research was to examine how Canada’s National Housing Strategy reflected the unique housing needs of immigrants, refugees, and newcomers. The research question was answered using a version of intersectionality-based critical policy analysis (IBCPA) developed by Hankivsky et al. (2012); data collection and analysis was divided into two data sets and two phases. The first stage of analysis and data set focussed on the NHS document specifically. Using a set of critical questions outlined by the method, the NHS was examined, revealing three main themes related to immigrants, refugees, and newcomers: problematic representations, conceptualizations of power, and how context impacts housing for immigrants, refugees, and newcomers. Using intersectionality as the theoretical perspective, these themes are discussed in relation to each other and current hegemonic ideologies in Canadian society. The second phase of the research uses the second data set: interview data I collected from four policy stakeholders. In this phase, I presented interview participants with the results from the first phase of the project. Using semi-structured interviews, I explored with them the history of housing policy in Canada, how the current NHS was generally received, and how they thought it would impact immigrants, refugees, and newcomers given housing precarity in a segment of this population. Again, using intersectionality to frame the results, four themes emerged: the absence of lived experiences related to housing insecurity and homelessness among immigrants, refugees, and newcomers, the impact policies have on housing issues, overall neo-colonial and racist representations of immigrants, refugees, and newcomers in the NHS, and solutions to the problem of housing insecurity and homelessness among immigrants, refugees, and newcomers. These results are discussed in relation to each other. Further, they assist in identifying and challenging power differentials to examine hegemonic ideologies which emerged in the data.
    In addition to the results from the research study, this dissertation explores several other areas of inquiry. One of the chapters explores my positionality as a researcher and how this positionality relates to research projects, while taking a critical and personal examination about how I am connected to this work. Another area of exploration is to describe the methodological processes and implications of using intersectionality-based critical policy analysis. Finally, I present a discussion paper in which the implications of using intersectionality as a theoretical proposition in nursing can be used to foster leadership for nurses aiming to impact social policy issues.

  • Subjects / Keywords
  • Graduation date
    Fall 2019
  • Type of Item
    Thesis
  • Degree
    Doctor of Philosophy
  • DOI
    https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-bdwe-q749
  • License
    Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.