ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Alberta Investment Management  Corporation:  An Examination of a Corporatization Project:  Preliminary AssessmentDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R39C6S29G

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Economics, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Other Publications (Economics)

Alberta Investment Management Corporation: An Examination of a Corporatization Project: Preliminary Assessment Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Ascah, Robert L.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Public Economics
Business
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Alberta
Time
Description
The study examines the decision in 2006–2007 by the Alberta government to establish an arms-length, board-governed, investment management corporation expressly to improve investment performance and build local expertise in investment management. The comparison of the investment returns achieved by Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo) for four provincial funds versus those achieved previously in the Department of Finance against established benchmarks shows little, if any, improvement. A second method of analysis, the Difference-of-Differences (DiD) method, indicates improving performance of AIMCo relative to its public sector investment management peers and its predecessor organization. All comparisons are highly sensitive to time periods chosen. AIMCo commenced operations in January 2008 when the financial crisis was still evolving. Consequently, the period to March 31, 2008 (Heritage Fund) and to December 2007 (pension funds) is used for the Alberta Investment Management (AIM) performance. The performance numbers for AIMCo commence on January 1 2010 for three pension funds and April 1, 2010 for the Heritage Fund and thereby exclude losses incurred in the 2008–2009 financial tumult. The reader is cautioned that the analysis is carried out at a high level and it may still be too early to fairly judge outcomes since AIMCo “inherited” its investment portfolio. Moreover, the investment policies that are given to AIMCo by the funds’ trustees to manage under have changed; specifically a move to place more funds in investment classes that cost more to manage, carry more risk, but offer potential higher returns. The study also shows the major beneficiaries of the transformation appear to be the senior managers and particularly the senior executives of AIMCo, whose pay has increased significantly. Unfortunately, there were no clear, public performance standards established for AIMCo as a whole and therefore no public assessment or debate of the success of the AIMCo corporatization project.. Given a new government assuming power, several policy suggestions are advanced including a detailed and careful review of AIMCo’s performance and governance structure.
Date created
2016/04/15
DOI
doi:10.7939/R39C6S29G
License information
Attribution 4.0 International
Rights

Citation for previous publication
A previous version of this paper was presented to the Public Administration Theory Conference Vancouver, British Columbia on 30 May 2015.
Source

Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-04-29T08:20:47.984+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1002721
Last modified: 2016:04:29 08:11:36-06:00
Filename: Ascah, Robert AIMCO - An Examination of a Corporatization Project.pdf
Original checksum: 877710f1d0539c6a4a1c43f40b5aa500
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=4783
Status message: Invalid Annotation property offset=147327
Status message: Outlines contain recursive references.
File title: Cover
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date