Search
Skip to Search Results-
2017-07-18
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
This document is a checklist of strategic aspects for all sections of a CIHR Foundation Scheme Stage 1 application. The checklist is designed to be used by anyone reviewing a grant application document before it is submitted to a CIHR Foundation Scheme competition. Intended users include members...
-
2017-02-03
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
This document is a checklist of strategic aspects for all sections of a CIHR Foundation Scheme Stage 2 application. The checklist is designed to be used by anyone reviewing a grant application document before it is submitted to a CIHR Foundation Scheme competition. Intended users include members...
-
2017-07-10
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
Is there a magic formula for writing a CIHR Project grant proposal? How do you “tell a good story” as everyone advises? We can’t offer a magic formula, but we can help you apply strategies that have worked for successful applicants: how to organize your proposal to cover each evaluation...
-
2016-09-11
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
Outlined in this document is a summary of the most common weaknesses listed by CIHR reviewers in feedback received by University of Alberta applicants to the Stage 2 Foundation 2014 competition. Analysis was performed on 53 reviews of 11 applications. Four of the applications analyzed were...
-
2016-09-26
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
This document is an extensive checklist for the research module of a grant application. The checklist is designed to be used by anyone reviewing a grant application document before it is submitted to a funding competition. Intended users include members of Internal Review committees, grant...
-
2016-09-26
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
The objective of this document is to assist researchers in preparing research proposals that are scientifically compelling and easy for reviewers to read. These guidelines may be particularly useful to applicants, and may aid internal reviewers and grant application editors. Included are...
-
2016-09-11
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
Outlined in this document is a summary of the most common strengths listed in by CIHR reviewers in feedback received by University of Alberta applicants to the Stage 2 Foundation 2014 competition. Analysis was performed on 53 reviews of 11 applications. Four of the applications analyzed were...
-
2015-01-06
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
This document is an extensive checklist for all modules of a CIHR Open Operating Grant Program (OOGP) application. The checklist is designed to be used by anyone reviewing a grant application document before submission to a CIHR OOGP competition. Intended users include members of Internal Review...
-
2014-08-06
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing
What are critical features of a compelling application to Stage 1 of the CIHR Foundation Scheme competition? The Foundation Scheme application is dramatically different for a CIHR Operating Grant application in content, length, and style. Since the Foundation competition is new in 2014, and we...
-
2014-05-08
McPhalen, Cathy - PhD, thINK Editing, Coe, Helen - Project Coordinator, Grant Assist Program (Health Sciences), Simala-Grant, Joanne - Director, Grant Assist Program (Health Sciences)
Outlined in this document are web-based resources to aid in the preparation of grant applications. Resources have been separated based on their relevance to: finding funding, peer review process, grantsmanship, common errors found in grant proposals and specific peer review information. Each...