This is a decommissioned version of ERA which is running to enable completion of migration processes. All new collections and items and all edits to existing items should go to our new ERA instance at https://ualberta.scholaris.ca - Please contact us at erahelp@ualberta.ca for assistance!
- 208 views
- 193 downloads
[Review of the book Words Without Objects: Semantics, Ontology, and Logic for Non-Singularity, by Haycock]
-
- Author(s) / Creator(s)
-
Introduction: Many languages mark a distinction which is commonly referred to as the “mass/count- distinction”; e.g., the distinction between the two occurrences of ‘hair’ in ‘There is hairin my soup’ and ‘There is a hair in my soup’. Often, the mass/count-distinction is drawn primarily with respect to nouns and noun-phrases (or particular occurrences thereof); and it is drawn (at least in English) using syntactic criteria such as the presence or absence of plural-morphology and the licensing of particular kinds of determiners and quantifiers (‘much’ versus ‘many’, etc.). Such purely syntactic criteria lead to the following sort of classification: Mass-Nouns: ‘air’, ‘snow’, ‘clothing’, ‘knowledge’, ... Count-Nouns: ‘beach’, ‘sheep’, ‘clothes’, ‘belief’, ... Dual-Use Nouns: ‘hair’, ‘cloth’, ‘pain’, ‘justification’, ... Even more so than the question of how exactly the mass/count-distinction is to be drawn, linguists and philosophers have been exercised by the question of how this distinction should be interpreted semantically and whether it has any ontological implications.
-
- Date created
- 2007
-
- Subjects / Keywords
-
- Type of Item
- Review
-
- License
- © 2007 K. Koslicki et al. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.