ERA is in the process of being migrated to Scholaris, a Canadian shared institutional repository service (https://scholaris.ca). Deposits and changes to existing ERA items and collections are frozen until migration is complete. Please contact erahelp@ualberta.ca for further assistance
- 261 views
- 246 downloads
Breach of Good Faith in Performance of the Franchise Contract: Punitive Damages and Damages for Intangibles
-
- Author(s) / Creator(s)
-
This paper explores case law concerning breach of good faith in the franchise contract. Given the relational nature of the franchise contract, the good faith term forbids the franchisor from exploiting the franchisee’s classic vulnerability. The paper also illustrates why the franchisor is more susceptible to an award of punitive damages. It concludes by making the novel argument that franchisees should be permitted to recover damages for mental distress and other intangibles resulting from breach of the good faith term.
-
- Date created
- 2004
-
- Type of Item
- Article (Published)
-
- License
- © 2004 Shannon O'Byrne. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.