Comment on “Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute deposition rates from single peat records? The example of Store Mosse, Sweden,” by Richard Bindler, Malin Klarqvist, Jonatan Klaminder, and Johannes Förster.

Shotyk, W.

doi:doi:10.7939/R33N20F3C

This decommissioned ERA site remains active temporarily to support our final migration steps to https://ualberta.scholaris.ca, ERA's new home. All new collections and items, including Spring 2025 theses, are at that site. For assistance, please contact erahelp@ualberta.ca.

View

Download

Communities and Collections

Renewable Resources, Department of / Journal Articles (Renewable Resources)

Usage

217 views
166 downloads

Comment on “Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute deposition rates from single peat records? The example of Store Mosse, Sweden,” by Richard Bindler, Malin Klarqvist, Jonatan Klaminder, and Johannes Förster.

Author(s) / Creator(s)
- Shotyk, W.
Date created

2006
Subjects / Keywords
Type of Item

Review
DOI

https://doi.org/10.7939/R33N20F3C
License

© 2006 American Geophysical Union. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.

Language
- English
Citation for previous publication
- Shotyk, W. (2006) Comment on “Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute deposition rates from single peat records? The example of Store Mosse, Sweden,” by Richard Bindler, Malin Klarqvist, Jonatan Klaminder, and Johannes Förster. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20(2), GB2004, doi:10.1029/2005GB002528.