ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Is the New Paragraph More Readable than the Traditional Paragraph?Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3JQ5Z

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Is the New Paragraph More Readable than the Traditional Paragraph? Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
numerically objectify
Gutenberg Diagram
wicked problems
availability sampling
Gunning-Fog
Cloze Procedure
Traditional Paragraph
Flesch Reading
Readability Test
Paragraph
Journalism
Readability
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Singh, Ravi Inder
Supervisor and department
Miller, James (Electrical and Computer Engineering)
Examining committee member and department
Salmon, John (Electrical and Computer Engineering)
Julien, Heidi (School of Library and Information Studies)
Department
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Specialization

Date accepted
2011-01-09T17:37:04Z
Graduation date
2011-06
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
The definition of the traditional paragraph has remained unchanged for generations of readers. Yet today the predominant form of the paragraph on the Web is so new that it can only be called the new paragraph. So the question is which is the more readable of the two paragraph formats? More specifically, how can the new paragraph be defined and how can its readability be measured against the traditional paragraph? A literature review reveals that no attempt has ever been made to define the new paragraph. A novel approach is taken: collect the headline stories from the top 43 English language online daily newspapers and use them to define the new paragraph. They exclusively use the new paragraph format and 1200 stories were collected from them over a period of four months. The results indicate a drastic difference between the old and new paragraph with the new paragraph being on average less than half the size of the old paragraph. White space between paragraphs occupies almost exactly half a given story. Words of less than two syllables are the norm in a new paragraph. To determine the readability of the new paragraph, a test of readability was performed using human subjects. A passage of text was selected and formatted according to the rules for the traditional paragraph and according to the metrics of the new paragraph. The cloze procedure is then used to decide readability. The reading test‟s data is analyzed and the results and future directions of the study are discussed in the conclusion.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3JQ5Z
Rights
License granted by Ravi Singh (risingh@ualberta.ca) on 2011-01-07T19:52:26Z (GMT): Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of the above terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis, and except as herein provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-25T00:20:06.278+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 946090
Last modified: 2015:10:12 16:08:56-06:00
Filename: SinghThesis - Submit.pdf
Original checksum: eab131a303a26a75d217da7d05273ed5
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=13278
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=13404
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=13529
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=13655
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=13782
File author: Ravi Singh
Page count: 85
File language: en-CA
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date