Download the full-sized PDF of Effects of Spatial Structures on the Results of Field ExperimentsDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

Biological Sciences, Department of


This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Biological Sciences)

Effects of Spatial Structures on the Results of Field Experiments Open Access


Author or creator
Legendre, P.
Dale, M. R. T.
Fortin, M. J.
Casgrain, P.
Gurevitch, J.
Additional contributors
Field experiments
Spatial structure
Numerical simulation study
Analysis of variance
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Abstract: Field experiments have been designed to account for spatial Structures since the inception of randomized complete block designs by R. A. Fisher. In recent years, our understanding of spatial structures led to refinements in the design and analysis of field experiments in the face of spatial patterning. In the presence of spatial autocorrelation in the response variable, is it possible to optimize the experimental design to maximize the response to the experimental factors? The questions addressed in this paper are: (1) What is the effect of spatial autocorrelation on type I error of the tests of significance commonly used to analyze the results of field experiments? (2) How effectively can we control for the effect of spatial autocorrelation by the design of the experiment? (3) Which experimental designs lead to tests of significance that have greater power? (4) What is the influence of Spatial autocorrelation on power of ANOVA tests of significance? This paper attempts to answer these questions through numerical simulations with known spatial autocorrelation. Response variable were simulated to represent the SLIM of separate effects: (1) an explanatory environmental variable (which could be used as a covariable in the analysis) with a deterministic structure Plus spatial autocorrelation, (2) an effect of the experimental treatments, (3) spatial autocorrelation in the response (e.g., biological) variable, and (4) it random error. The program repeatedly generated and analyzed Surfaces with given parameters (1000 replicates). The rejection rate of the null hypothesis of no effect of the treatment onto the response variable provided estimates of type 1 error and power. The simulations showed the following: (1) In the presence of spatial autocorrelation, or if repetitive deterministic Structures are present in the variables influencing the response, experimental units should not be positioned at random. (2) ANOVA that takes blocking into account is an efficient way of correcting for deterministic structures or spatial autocorrelation. (3) For constant effort, experimental designs that have more, smaller blocks, broadly spread across the experimental area, lead to tests that have more power in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. (4) Short-ranged spatial autocorrelation affects the power of ANOVA tests more than large-ranged spatial autocorrelation.
Date created
License information
© 2004 Ecological Society of America. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
Legendre, P., Dale, M. R. T., Fortin, M.-J., Casgrain, P., & Gurevitch, J. (2004). Effects of Spatial Structures on the Results of Field Experiments. Ecology, 85(12), 3202-3214. DOI: 10.1890/03-0677.
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 349360
Last modified: 2015:10:12 16:33:17-06:00
Filename: Ecology_85_2004_3202.pdf
Original checksum: 2d579dc3980ec02a66bc97942261c0e3
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Improperly formed date offset=347860
File title:
File author: sthaya
Page count: 13
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date