ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Variable Lexicalization of Dynamic Events in Language Production: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers of French and EnglishDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R31P9G

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Variable Lexicalization of Dynamic Events in Language Production: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers of French and English Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Crosslinguistic Influence (CLI)
Synonymy
Bilingualism
Lexicalization
Language Production
Psycholinguistics
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Peters, Julia
Supervisor and department
Libben, Gary (Linguistics)
Newman, John (Linguistics)
Examining committee member and department
Nadasdi, Terry (Linguistics)
Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer (Modern Languages and Cultural Studies)
Nicoladis, Elena (Psychology)
Watt, David (Education)
Rice, Sally (Linguistics)
Department
Department of Linguistics
Specialization

Date accepted
2010-01-19T21:51:31Z
Graduation date
2010-06
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
This study explores how bilingualism impacts lexical selection within spontaneous spoken language production. The particular analysis focuses on the choice between synonymous verbs in English. The main hypothesis predicts that, as a result of crosslinguistic influence, bilingual speakers of French and English will opt for the English synonym which has structural correspondence to the French translation equivalent more often than monolingual speakers, who do not experience an influence from French. Structural correspondence exists in two distinct ways: in the form of cognates (e.g., applaudir/applaud vs. clap) and in terms of the number of free morphemes used to convey the same semantic information (e.g., lever/raise vs. put up). The language production data was generated by participants viewing video scenes and describing the action as it progressed. The frequency with which the different verbs were used was then compared across the different participant groups: monolingual English speakers and bilingual speakers of both French and English. The bilingual group was also subdivided based on language dominance. A range of different analyses were conducted. A framework is established for interpreting the data. Bilingualism can have one of three main effects on the speech of bilinguals relative to monolinguals: (a) an expanding effect, in which bilinguals use a wider range of lexical forms than monolinguals, (b) a limiting effect, in which bilinguals use a more limited range of lexical items than bilinguals, and (c) a modifying effect, in which the range of lexical items is basically the same between bilinguals and monolinguals but varies in terms of the frequency with which those lexical forms are used (a type of CLI labeled ‘covert’). These effects interact with certain speaker variables such as which language is the speaker’s dominant language. The stage(s) within the language production process at which CLI impacts ultimate lexicalization is also explored. Current models of language production which focus on lexical selection are discussed. The results of this study are most compatible with specific notions such as lexical access being target-language non-specific (see Costa, 2004, for example) and the Weaker Links Hypothesis (e.g., Gollan and Silverberg, 2001; Gollan, Montoya, & Werner, 2002).
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R31P9G
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-01T00:42:36.477+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3303308
Last modified: 2015:10:12 13:06:09-06:00
Filename: Peters_Julia_Spring2010.pdf
Original checksum: 1b02955ad8cb32f4cd9bd12df0790d13
Well formed: true
Valid: true
Status message: Too many fonts to report; some fonts omitted. Total fonts = 1138
File title: University of Alberta
File author: Julia Peters
Page count: 298
File language: en-US
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date