Download the full-sized PDF of FIRE (Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence): A study protocolDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of


This file is in the following collections:

Health Systems

FIRE (Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence): A study protocol Open Access


Author or creator
Seers, K.
Cox, K.
Crichton, N.J.
Edwards, R.T.
Eldh, A.C.
Estabrooks, C.A.
Harvey, G.
Hawkes, C.
Kitson, A.
Linck, T.
McCarthy, G.
McCormack, B.
Mockford, C.
Rycroft-Malone, G.
Titchen, A.
Wallin, L.
Additional contributors
Promoting action
Services parihs framework
Cardiovascular disease
Conceptual framework
Urinary incontinence
Controlled trial
Quality of life
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Background: Research evidence underpins best practice, but is not always used in healthcare. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework suggests that the nature of evidence, the context in which it is used, and whether those trying to use evidence are helped (or facilitated) affect the use of evidence. Urinary incontinence has a major effect on quality of life of older people, has a high prevalence, and is a key priority within European health and social care policy. Improving continence care has the potential to improve the quality of life for older people and reduce the costs associated with providing incontinence aids. Objectives: This study aims to advance understanding about the contribution facilitation can make to implementing research findings into practice via: extending current knowledge of facilitation as a process for translating research evidence into practice; evaluating the feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of two different models of facilitation in promoting the uptake of research evidence on continence management; assessing the impact of contextual factors on the processes and outcomes of implementation; and implementing a pro-active knowledge transfer and dissemination strategy to diffuse study findings to a wide policy and practice community. Setting and sample: Four European countries, each with six long-term nursing care sites (total 24 sites) for people aged 60 years and over with documented urinary incontinence Methods and design: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial with three arms (standard dissemination and two different programmes of facilitation), with embedded process and economic evaluation. The primary outcome is compliance with the continence recommendations. Secondary outcomes include proportion of residents with incontinence, incidence of incontinence-related dermatitis, urinary tract infections, and quality of life. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, then at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the start of the facilitation interventions. Detailed contextual and process data are collected throughout, using interviews with staff, residents and next of kin, observations, assessment of context using the Alberta Context Tool, and documentary evidence. A realistic evaluation framework is used to develop explanatory theory about what works for whom in what circumstances.
Date created
License information
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported

Citation for previous publication
Seers, K., Cox, K., Crichton, N.J., Edwards, R.T., Eldh, A.C., Estabrooks, C.A., Harvey, G., Hawkes, C., Kitson, A., Linck, T., McCarthy, G., McCormack, B., Mockford, C., Rycroft-Malone, G., Titchen, A., and Wallin, L. (2012). FIRE (Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence): A study protocol. Implementation Science, 7(25), 1-11. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-25.
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 257828
Last modified: 2015:10:12 18:56:26-06:00
Filename: IS_7_2012_25.pdf
Original checksum: 51d9f85e724d3d6c3c387006c4550f66
Copyright note: ?? 2012 Seers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=244983
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=244556
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=244556
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=244556
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=244556
File title: Abstract
File title: FIRE (Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence): a study protocol
File author: Kate Seers
Page count: 11
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date