The Association between Rural Residence and Return To Work in Workers' Compensation Claimants Open Access
- Other title
Return to Work
- Type of item
- Degree grantor
University of Alberta
- Author or creator
Lavoie, Callum A
- Supervisor and department
Gross, Doug (Physical Therapy)
- Examining committee member and department
Beach, Jeremy (Medicine)
Voaklander, Don (Public Health)
Gross, Doug (Physical Therapy)
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Date accepted
- Graduation date
Master of Science
- Degree level
The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the association between geographic location of residence and recovery from work-related MSK injury in workers’ compensation claimants; and (2) to determine whether the association between geographic location of residence and recovery from work-related MSK injury in workers’ compensation claimants is attenuated or becomes non-significant after controlling for other demographic, occupational, and health risk factors.
Secondary analysis of a dataset containing information on 7,843 workers’ compensation claimants from across the province of Alberta who experienced MSK injury was performed. The dataset had information on several variables collected at time of comprehensive clinical/work assessment including location of residence, age, sex, level of education, type of work, injury diagnosis, and health care utilization, among other factors. The dataset also included compensation wage replacement outcomes up to 3 months after the clinical/work assessment. Multivariable risk factor modeling using logistic and cox regression was used to determine the association between rurality and work disability outcomes while controlling for potential confounders.
Rural claimants were significantly different (p<0.05) from their urban counterparts on several variables. Rural claimants were less likely to be job attached (83.7% vs 85.6%), less likely to require an interpreter during assessment (0.4%vs 4.1%), more likely to not have a high school diploma (15.3% vs 12.8%) or university degree (2.4% vs 6.2%), more likely to work in ‘blue-collar’ jobs (59.4% vs 55.0%), reported lower pain intensity (4.96 vs. 5.14/10), but had more visits to doctors (15.96 vs 13.92) and fewer visits to physiotherapists (18.11 vs 19.47). Univariable modeling found rural residence to be significantly associated with worse outcomes (OR 1.45, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.20-1.75). Multivariable modeling showed that rural residence remained significantly associated with worse outcomes while controlling for potential confounders (adjusted OR 1.57, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.20 – 2.04).
Rural residence was associated with prolonged work disability, even after controlling for age, job type, education level, health utilization and other potential confounders. Further research is required to explore why injured workers in rural settings experience difficulty with recovery from work-related injury.
- Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
- Citation for previous publication
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3868450
Last modified: 2015:10:12 18:01:25-06:00
Original checksum: 08418c9a303c1465daf223faa9b16349
Activity of users you follow