ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Diagnostic Score Reporting for a Dental Hygiene Structured Clinical AssessmentDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3QZ22X2P

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Diagnostic Score Reporting for a Dental Hygiene Structured Clinical Assessment Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Reflection
Dental Hygiene
Structured Clinical Assessment
Feedback
Diagnostic Score Reporting
Objective Structured Clinical Examination
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Clarke, Alix, K
Supervisor and department
Yoon, Minn (School of Dentistry)
Lai, Hollis (Medicine and Dentistry)
Examining committee member and department
Yoon, Minn (Dentistry)
Lai, Hollis (Medicine and Dentistry)
Daniels, Vijay (Medicine)
Department
Medical Sciences-Dental Hygiene
Specialization

Date accepted
2017-09-29T09:04:23Z
Graduation date
2017-11:Fall 2017
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
Background: Structured clinical assessments (SCAs) are an essential part of health professional education as they capture important information on not only what a student knows, but what they can do. However, this useful information is rarely translated into quality feedback that students can use to reflect upon and improve their clinical performance. Feedback is considered a fundamental component of both learning and professional development, and educators are calling for more and better feedback across the health disciplines. However, issues such as time limitations and test confidentiality make feedback provision for SCAs challenging. Diagnostic score reporting (DSR) presents a possible framework for providing all students with more detailed feedback on their SCA performances. DSR summarizes test performance by the underlying domains of knowledge, skills and/or abilities the test intends to measure, and includes resources for making individual improvements within those domains. DSR does not require the actual test items to be revealed to the students, and can be administered efficiently through online means. As such, DSR has some advantageous as potential feedback mechanism for SCAs. To date, DSR has largely been applied only within the context of large-scale assessment, particularly in primary and secondary education. Additionally, very little research has been conducted on the feedback’s measurable impact on student outcomes. Objectives: To develop a general framework for applying DSR within SCAs; to develop and validate a course-specific diagnostic score report for a dental hygiene SCA; and to evaluate the effect of DSR on student reflection and performance. Methods: A literature-based adapted DSR framework was developed to guide the process of DSR for SCAs. This general framework was then applied towards a dental hygiene history taking SCA at the University of Alberta. This process involved identifying the diagnostic domains of the assessment and linking competencies, test items, and learning resources to those domains. In order to evaluate the effect of DSR on student outcomes, a mock-SCA was developed where half the students were randomly assigned to receive DSR, while the other half received only one overall numerical grade following the assessment. All students were then asked to reflect upon their mock-SCA performance, and later completed their regularly scheduled year-end history taking SCA. The results were collected and analyzed to look for differences between groups on reflection quality, content, and year-end SCA results. Results: Four skills-based domains were identified as necessary to complete the dental hygiene history taking SCA: effective communication, client-centered care, eliciting essential information, and interpreting findings. No differences in reflection quality were found, while reflection content significantly differed by the experimental groups. The DSR group was significantly more likely to report needing to improve on interpreting findings (p = .007), while the control group focused on eliciting information (p = .04). Overall, students tended to perform quite well on eliciting information (M = 92.11%, SD = 9.63%), but poorly on interpreting findings (M = 42.11%, SD = 17.56%). The DSR group did not show significant improvements in their year-end SCA results. Conclusions: DSR appeared to result in improved identification of history taking skills that required improvement, however this improved self-assessment did not translate into improved performance. DSR presents a promising start for improving the feedback students receive following their SCAs, however further enhancements are required. Suggestions for improving the feedback to facilitate behaviour change include: improving the learning resources provided to the students within the report, adding video feedback (self and exemplars), providing a means for students to response to their feedback, and increasing the individualization/personalization of the reports.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3QZ22X2P
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2017-09-29T15:04:24.619+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/X)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 2013385
Last modified: 2017:11:08 16:43:32-07:00
Filename: Clarke_Alix_K_201709_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 93ba1f63daa1613297497c6e776e6bec
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date