ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Examining Canadian Teacher's Perceptions of the Importance of Cognitive Abilities in the ClassroomDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3416T47T

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Examining Canadian Teacher's Perceptions of the Importance of Cognitive Abilities in the Classroom Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) abilities
pre-service teachers
in-service teachers
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Singh, Deepak
Supervisor and department
Cormier, Damien (Educational Psychology)
Examining committee member and department
Cormier, Damien (Educational Psychology)
Daniels, Lia (Educational Psychology)
Bulut, Okan (Educational Psychology)
Department
Department of Educational Psychology
Specialization
School and Clinical Child Psychology
Date accepted
2016-09-29T09:11:29Z
Graduation date
2016-06:Fall 2016
Degree
Master of Education
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
The current study examined the perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers of the importance of different Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities in the classroom. The sample included 227 pre-service teachers from the University of Alberta and 44 in-service teachers from the St. Albert Catholic School district. Reliability (Coefficient alpha), and the mean level of importance was calculated for the responses of the two groups. An independent samples t-test evaluated whether there were significant differences in the ratings of the two groups. Finally, Within- Subject ANOVA evaluated whether the ratings for the level of importance differed significantly within each group. The results indicated that both the pre-service and the in-service teachers perceived Fluid Reasoning (Gf) as one of the most important predictors of student success in the classroom, followed by Crystallized Ability (Gc), Quantitative Ability (Gq), and Visual Processing (Gv). The results from the independent samples t-test displayed no significant differences in mean ratings between the two groups on all of the cognitive abilities. Implications for teaching practice as well as teacher-psychologist consultation are discussed.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3416T47T
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-09-29T15:11:30.231+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 348698
Last modified: 2016:11:16 14:04:12-07:00
Filename: Singh_Deepak_201609_MEd.pdf
Original checksum: 1b331c5b1654431d35d1d3a4685a5b64
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid object number or object stream offset=2242
Status message: Invalid Annotation list offset=313264
File language: en-CA
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date