ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trialsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3JH3DG87

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Pediatrics, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Complementary and Alternative Research and Education (CARE)

Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Bhaloo, Zafira
Adams, Denise
Liu, Yali
Hansraj, Namrata
Hartling, Lisa
Terwee, Caroline B.
Vohra, Sunita
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Pediatric
Outcome measure
Primary outcome
Reporting
Systematic review
Randomized controlled trial
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Objective: Conduct a systematic review of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in high impact journals to assess the reporting of primary outcomes and the psychometric properties of their measures. Study Design and Setting: Systematic review with screening and simultaneous data extraction conducted by two independent reviewers. Electronic searches of six general medicine and four pediatric journals were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Randomized controlled trials of a single phase/step in a single publication, published in English between 2000 and 2010 with participants less than 21 years of age were included. Results: A random sample of 20% (n=446) of 2229 initial references was screened and 206 (46%) met inclusion criteria. Half (48.5%) of included studies reported a singular primary outcome, 27% did not identify any primary outcome, and 24% identified multiple primary outcomes (range 2-20). Twenty one trials used an instrument to measure their primary outcome, but only 7 (33%) reported its psychometric properties. Conclusions: Pediatric trials published in top medical journals have inadequate reporting of their primary outcomes and the psychometric properties of their outcome measures. Whether the issue is one of poor reporting and/or poor validation will be further investigated.
Date created
2016/09/22
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3JH3DG87
License information
Rights
© 2017 Bhaloo, Z., Adams, D., Liu, Y., Hansraj, N., Hartling, L., Terwee, C.B., & Vohra, S. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication

Source

Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2018-01-17T17:40:57.569+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 645979
Last modified: 2018:01:17 10:41:02-07:00
Filename: JCE_81_2017_33.pdf
Original checksum: 5eef3af322a1ba95550b84b2578caf57
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File author: Zafira
Page count: 19
File language: en-US
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date