ERA

Download the full-sized Document of Reliability of Online Scoring of First Mentions in the Edmonton Narrative Normative InstrumentDownload the full-sized Document

Actions

Download  |  Analytics

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Speech Pathology and Audiology

Reliability of Online Scoring of First Mentions in the Edmonton Narrative Normative Instrument Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Abraham, Sandia
Shaw, Kendra
Additional contributors
Schneider, Phyllis
Cummine, Jacqueline
Subject/Keyword
reliability
First Mentions (FM)
scoring
Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument (ENNI)
online
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
When a story is told, referring expressions are used to introduce referents (characters and objects). This must be done so that the listener clearly understands that the character or object is new to the story (Schneider & Hayward, 2010). The ability to use referents correctly, according to the shared physical context and the preceding linguistic context, develops throughout the early school years (Hickmann, 2003). The term First Mentions (FM) has been coined to refer to the referring expressions that children use when introducing characters and objects when telling a story (Schneider & Hayward, 2010). Recently, in the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument (ENNI; Schneider, Dubé, & Hayward, 2002), a specific scoring system was developed to evaluate the appropriateness and sophistication of FMs through transcription analysis (Schneider & Hayward, 2010). The norms produced allow speech-language pathologists to differentiate between typically developing children and children with specific language impairment (Schneider & Hayward, 2010). This research examined whether it is possible to use the scoring system reliably when listening to the stories on tape, without transcribing. To determine reliability, stories from the original study were scored 'online' by listening to recordings of 41 narratives of children from the original ENNI study (Schneider & Hayward, 2010) and applying the FM scoring system while listening to the recordings. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was used to determine reliability between transcription and online FM scoring. This statistical measure assessed inter-rater agreement between the FM scores and adjusted for probabilities of occurrence of individual FM categories (Rosner, 2006). Results indicated strong agreement (κ = .874) between the two analysis types. This research result indicates online scoring of FM is appropriate for speech-language pathologists to use.
Date created
2011/07/07
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-24T23:59:21.294+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: msword (Microsoft Word)
Mime type: application/msword
File size: 148480
Last modified: 2015:10:12 15:04:05-06:00
Filename: SPA 900 Abraham & Shaw.doc
Original checksum: 11016e83c1d50556ec51cc0976d0c25b
File title: Running Head: RELIABILITY OF ONLINE SCORING OF FIRST MENTIONS FOR THE EDMONTON NARRATIVE NORMS INSTRUMENT
File author: Kendra Ann Grace Shaw
Page count: 25
File language: U.S. English
Word count: 5477
Character count: 31220
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date