Search
Skip to Search Results- 4Research design
- 1Assessement
- 1Biomedical research
- 1Grant application
- 1Health care delivery
- 1Health promotion
- 2Nursing, Faculty of
- 2Medicine and Dentistry, Faculty of
- 2Medicine and Dentistry, Faculty of/Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE)
- 1Toolkit for Grant Success
- 1Toolkit for Grant Success/Educational Materials (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 1Nursing, Faculty of/Health Equity
-
Conceiving action, tracking practice, and locating expertise for health promotion research.
Download2004
Health promotion is the process of enabling persons, families, neighbourhoods, communities, sectors, and societies to take action around the development and implementation of health determinants.The goal is to put health determinants in the control of individuals through programming that enhances...
-
2013
Scott, S. D., Moher, D., Klassen, T. P., Hartling, L., Hamm, M. P.
Introduction A research-practice gap exists between what is known about conducting methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and what is done. Evidence consistently shows that pediatric RCTs are susceptible to high risk of bias; therefore novel methods of influencing the...
-
Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.
Download2009
Dryden, D. M., Krebs Seida, J., Ospina, M., Hooton, N., Hartling, L., Klassen, T. P., Liang, Y.
Objectives To evaluate the risk of bias tool, introduced by the Cochrane Collaboration for assessing the internal validity of randomised trials, for inter-rater agreement, concurrent validity compared with the Jadad scale and Schulz approach to allocation concealment, and the relation between...