Search
Skip to Search Results
Filter
Subject / Keyword
- 3Canada. Supreme Court
- 2Fiscal policy--Canada
- 1Alberta. Court of Appeal
- 1Canada--Politics & Government
- 1Canada. Taxation--Cases
- 1Federal-provincial fiscal relations--Canada
Author / Creator / Contributor
- 1Billingsley, Barbara
- 1Boothe, Paul Michael, 1954-
- 1Elman, Bruce P.
- 1Hsu, Berry Fong-Chung
- 1McInnes, Mitchell
- 1Reid, Bradford.
Year
Collections
- 2Law, Faculty of
- 2Law, Faculty of/Journal Articles (Law)
- 1Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (GPS), Faculty of
- 1Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (GPS), Faculty of/Theses and Dissertations
- 1Western Centre for Economic Research
- 1Western Centre for Economic Research/Information Bulletins (Western Centre for Economic Research)
Languages
Item type
-
2011
The article focuses on the advances made by the Supreme Court of Canada in the law of unjust enrichment on the case of Kerr versus Baranow which was clarified by Cromwell J. by returning to the first principles of unjust enrichment. The author states that the failure of the court to recognize the...
-
The Supreme Court of Canada and the Alberta Court of Appeal: Do the top courts have a fundamental philosophical difference of opinion on public law issues?
Download2001
Billingsley, Barbara, Elman, Bruce P.
Prompted by the marked clash between the Supreme Court of Canada and the Alberta Court of Appeal in R. v. Ewanchuk, the authors ask whether this conflict is indicative of a fundamental divergence of opinion between the two courts. To answer this question, the authors embark on a review of all 132...
1 - 4 of 4