Search
Skip to Search Results
Filter
Subject / Keyword
- 2Contracts law
- 1Business & corporate law
- 1Civil procedure
- 1Enforceability
- 1Governments
- 1Insurance law
Author / Creator / Contributor
Year
Languages
Item type
-
2005
Introduction The general rule in contracts is that a plaintiff is not entitled to general damages for mental distress and other intangibles such as annoyance, humiliation, upset, disappointment, frustration, anguish, or anxiety in the face of breach. There are a number of reasons why this is so...
-
Assessing Exclusion Clauses: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Three Issue Framework in Tercon Contractors Ltd v British Columbia(Transportation and Highways)
Download2012
Introduction The Supreme Court of Canada's 2010 decision in Tercon Contractors Ltd v British Columbia (Transportation and Highways ) concerned the enforceability of a broadly drafted exclusion clause in the context of public procurement tendering. It is noteworthy for several reasons. First, the...
1 - 2 of 2