Search
Skip to Search Results- 5Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- 2Research design
- 1Acute Disease
- 1Analgesics
- 1Anesthetics, Local
- 1Assessement
- 6Medicine and Dentistry, Faculty of
- 5Medicine and Dentistry, Faculty of/Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE)
- 1University of Alberta Library
- 1University of Alberta Library/Libraries Staff Publications
- 1Nursing, Faculty of
- 1Nursing, Faculty of/Health Systems
-
A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007
Download2013-02-04
Hamm, Michele, Vandermeer, Ben, Thomson, Denise, Milne, Andrea, Tjosvold, Lisa, Klassen, Terry P., Curtis, Sarah, Hartling, Lisa
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for trials assessing the effects of therapeutic interventions; therefore it is important to understand how they are conducted. Our objectives were to provide an overview of a representative sample of pediatric RCTs published in...
-
2013
Scott, S. D., Moher, D., Klassen, T. P., Hartling, L., Hamm, M. P.
Introduction A research-practice gap exists between what is known about conducting methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and what is done. Evidence consistently shows that pediatric RCTs are susceptible to high risk of bias; therefore novel methods of influencing the...
-
Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.
Download2009
Dryden, D. M., Krebs Seida, J., Ospina, M., Hooton, N., Hartling, L., Klassen, T. P., Liang, Y.
Objectives To evaluate the risk of bias tool, introduced by the Cochrane Collaboration for assessing the internal validity of randomised trials, for inter-rater agreement, concurrent validity compared with the Jadad scale and Schulz approach to allocation concealment, and the relation between...