Search
Skip to Search Results- 4GAPSSHRC
- 4Schneider, Phyllis
- 3Peck, Carla
- 2Campbell, Kathryn J. (Supervisor)
- 2Currie, Samantha
- 2Gibson, Lindsay
- 20Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (GPS), Faculty of
- 20Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (GPS), Faculty of/Theses and Dissertations
- 10Toolkit for Grant Success
- 9Toolkit for Grant Success/Successful Grants (Toolkit for Grant Success)
- 4Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of
- 4Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of/Speech Pathology and Audiology
- 20Thesis
- 11Research Material
- 7Report
- 3Article (Published)
- 2Learning Object
- 1Conference/Workshop Poster
-
2016-02-15
SSHRC PG LOI|Stage 1 awarded 2016; Stage 2 not successful: Canada has long struggled with questions of national identity as a result of contested ground over the stories told about its past. Struggles over sovereignty by Quebec Francophones and Indigenous peoples, as well as the continued...
-
2018-10-29
SSHRC Awarded PG2 2019: When history education in Canada was first designed at the end of the 19th century, it was part of a nation-building project shaped by competing interests of Anglophone Canada and Francophone Québec. Indigenous peoples and their histories were completely omitted,...
-
2018-02-13
SSHRC PGLOI|Stage 1 awarded 2018: When history education in Canada was first designed at the end of the nineteenth century, it was part of a nation-building project shaped by competing interests of Anglophone Canada and Francophone Québec. Although history and social studies curricula and museum...
-
Fall 2012
This study, primarily theoretical in nature, explores a philosophically and pedagogically reasonable way of addressing nature of science (NOS) in school science. NOS encompasses what science is and how scientific knowledge develops. I critically evaluate consensus frameworks of NOS in school...
-
2016
Contributing to the recent debate on whether or not explanations ought to be differentiated from arguments, this article argues that the distinction matters to science education. I articulate the distinction in terms of explanations and arguments having to meet different standards of adequacy....