- 241 views
- 175 downloads
A comparison of four vowel overlap measures
-
- Author(s) / Creator(s)
-
Measures of vowel overlap explore the acoustic similarity between proposed and existing vowel categories. They typically compare F1 and F2, and sometimes duration. In the present study, we investigate four methods of quantifying vowel overlap: the spectral overlap assessment metric (Wassink, 2006), the a posteriori probability-based metric (Morrison, 2008), the vowel overlap assessment with convex hulls method (Haynes & Taylor, 2014), and the Pillai score as used by Hay et al. (2006). Based on the data for /i/ and /ɪ/ in Hillenbrand et al.’s (1995) data set, we used Monte Carlo style simulations and repeated subsampling to assess each method. We examined both the 2D (F1 and F2) and 3D (F1, F2, and duration) versions of the methods. We took the methods’ outputs as accurate if they produced values close to expected target values for each type of simulation, and we took the results as precise if there was little spread among the output values. The results suggest that the a posteriori probability-based metric is the most generally applicable, while the Pillai score should be used in scenarios where sensitivity to complete overlap is needed or where data cannot be said to be normally distributed.
ADDENDUM: Further simulations showed the Pillai score to be the most generally applicable measure of vowel overlap.
Presented at the 177th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, May 17, 2019, in Louisville, KY.
-
- Date created
- 2019-05-01
-
- Subjects / Keywords
-
- Type of Item
- Conference/Workshop Poster