Usage
  • 78 views
  • 271 downloads

The Value of Pork Quality in the Eyes of Consumers with Different Beliefs about Traditionally Raised Pork in Edmonton and in Canada

  • Author / Creator
    Ma, Lifen
  • In this research the value of pork chops with different quality attributes were examined for consumers in Edmonton (with real pork, stated purchase experiments) and across Canada (online survey). Value is examined through stated choice experiments with packaged pork chops labeled with production system (traditionally raised and conventional), as Canadian pork and/or as coming from a farm with Canadian Quality Assurance®. In Edmonton, hog carcass, meat and sensory quality of the pork chops used in the experiments were also investigated. In the national survey marbling was varied and is examined in terms of its influence on pork chop choice. Consumers are studied by groups based on their prior beliefs about traditionally raised pork in comparison to conventional pork. The results suggest that consumer prior beliefs affect consumer purchases of pork chops and play an important role in marketing differentiated pork. The certification of production system was found to be important. Public policy implications include the importance of production system verification by credible independent sources, in this case, usually the government.

  • Subjects / Keywords
  • Graduation date
    2012-11
  • Type of Item
    Thesis
  • Degree
    Master of Science
  • DOI
    https://doi.org/10.7939/R3607C
  • License
    This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for non-commercial purposes. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
  • Language
    English
  • Institution
    University of Alberta
  • Degree level
    Master's
  • Department
    • Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology
  • Specialization
    • Agricultural and Resource Economics
  • Supervisor / co-supervisor and their department(s)
    • Goddard, Ellen (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
  • Examining committee members and their departments
    • Mohapatra, Sandeep (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
    • Goddard, Ellen (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
    • Bruce, Heather (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)