Usage
  • 3 views
  • 8 downloads

Three Sides of a Coin: In Conversation with Ben Zvi and Nogalski Two Sides of a Coin

  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
  • This is a response to E. Ben Zvi and J. D. Nogalski, Two Sides of a Coin: Juxtaposing Views on Interpreting the Book of the Twelve/The Twelve Prophetic Books (Gorgias Press, 2009). Nogalski is a major proponent of the thesis that the Twelve Minor Prophets are a redactional unity, while Ben Zvi is its most forthright sceptic. After summarizing the views of both scholars, the author introduces some considerations from his perspective as a literary critic. In particular, he contends that: i) the question of literary unity is an extremely fraught one; ii)arguments for the unity of the Twelve tend to ignore contrast; and iii) the hypothesis that the Twelve were redacted as a book raises acutely not only the methodological difference between redaction-critical and reader-oriented approaches, but also the question of whether prophets were poets, characterized by literary daring. The article concludes with reflections on models of reading in antiquity, and the opposition between metanarratives and marginality.

  • Date created
    2010
  • Subjects / Keywords
  • Type of Item
    Article (Published)
  • DOI
    https://doi.org/10.7939/R3C824T63
  • License
    Attribution 4.0 International
  • Language
  • Citation for previous publication
    • Landy, F., (2010). Three Sides of a Coin: In Conversation with Ben Zvi and Nogalski Two Sides of a Coin. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures, 10(), 1-12.
  • Link to related item
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2010.v10.a11