Got Issues? Do New Features and Code Improvements Affect Defects?

• Author(s) / Creator(s)

  • Posnett, D.
  • Hindle, Abram
  • Devanbu, P.

• There is a perception that when new features are added to a system that those added and modified parts of the source-code are more fault prone. Many have argued that new code and new features are defect prone due to immaturity, lack of testing, as well unstable requirements. Unfortunately most previous work does not investigate the link between a concrete requirement or new feature and the defects it causes, in particular the feature, the changed code and the subsequent defects are rarely investigated. In this paper we investigate the relationship between improvements, new features and defects recorded within an issue tracker. A manual case study is performed to validate the accuracy of these issue types. We combine defect issues and new feature issues with the code from version-control systems that introduces these features, we then explore the relationship of new features with the fault-proneness of their implementations. We describe properties and produce models of the relationship between new features and fault proneness, based on the analysis of issue trackers and version-control systems. We find, surprisingly, that neither improvements nor new features have any significant effect on later defect counts, when controlling for size and total number of changes.

• Date created

  2011

• Subjects / Keywords

  • code improvements
  • source code
  • unstable requirements
  • version control systems
  • software engineering

• Type of Item

  Conference/Workshop Presentation

• DOI

  https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-4fpa-zf85

• License

  Attribution 4.0 International