This is a decommissioned version of ERA which is running to enable completion of migration processes. All new collections and items and all edits to existing items should go to our new ERA instance at https://ualberta.scholaris.ca - Please contact us at erahelp@ualberta.ca for assistance!
- 242 views
- 343 downloads
Bilingualism in Cassius Dio and the Second Sophistic
-
- Author(s) / Creator(s)
-
So I start with a simple observation, which is that Dio occasionally comments on the Greek and Latin bilingualism of emperors. Marcus Aurelius is the one that originally caught my eye, and I think it’s interesting to chew on because although I admit that I have not read every single piece of imperial Greek literature, I did not associate interest in bilingualism with the Hellenocentrism that characterizes so much of this literature. But I did see in Dio’s comment on bilingualism a version of the sort of self-reflexive literary pride found in those other Hellenocentric authors: if they pride themselves on Hellenic purity and judge their subject matter in terms of degree of Hellenicity, as a Greek writer of Roman history, it is only natural that Dio pride himself on being bilingual. So naturally he appreciates this quality in emperors. When I started looking further at these passages, however, I started noticing that not all references to Greek and Latin bilingualism are positive. So first, I’ll talk about why I think Dio is a particularly interesting case to consider for responses to bilingualism and then we’ll look at some passages.
-
- Date created
- 2018-05-26
-
- Subjects / Keywords
-
- Type of Item
- Conference/Workshop Presentation