Soil quality assessment in land reclamation

• Author / Creator

  Ojekanmi, Abimbola

• The development and application of quantitative soil quality assessment (SQA) concepts involve calibrating soil quality indicators (SQI), such as soil organic carbon (SOC), to soil management goals such as yield or biomass productivity to create soil quality-scoring functions (SQF). Currently, SQA is used primarily to evaluate agronomic land use, but the concept could easily be applied to other land uses such as reclamation. To do so, the robustness and transferability of predictive SQI and SQF must be demonstrated considering baseline variations between natural and reclaimed soils. The indices must also be responsive to and meet the design criteria and objectives of reclamation covers. Calibrating more complex, bi-directional and time sensitive relationships between SQI and performance measures such as forest soil productivity will also require defining SQF concepts needed to support a healthy forest stand, since that is often the goal for reconstructing and revegetating disturbed soils. The objective of this research was to develop quantitative, calibrated, justifiable and validated SQF within a SQA framework that would be suitable for assessing, monitoring and managing land reclamation. An existing SQI database and measures of ecosystem performance compiled over the last 30 years for Alberta oil sand reclamation was used to develop SQF relationships that were validated for both site specific and regional SQA scenarios. Accuracy and transferability of SQF were assessed based on their ability to reproduce known or specific treatment effects from independent sites. Baseline SOC variation was used as the main predictive indicator to identify functional management units and define boundary conditions for SQF. Both analytical (GYPSY) and process-model (BIOME-BGC) options were used to calibrate SQF for effects of time and available water holding capacity on forest productivity. Generally, SQF developed from natural soils were transferable and justifiably rated the quality of peat-mineral mix covers in reconstructed soils. Although high spatial and temporal variation in SOC was observed at the regional scale, SOC values were useful for defining and delineating functional management zones (p < 0.05) for further SQA applications. Based on those soil management zones, critical SQF thresholds and metrics for optimizing reclamation cover design were developed and evaluated based on their capability to supply soil nutrients such as nitrogen (N) as a measure of their performance. Both the GYPSY and BIOME-BGC models provided pre-validated outputs suitable for calibrating SQF. Finally, in seven application scenarios completed within this study, integrated soil quality ratings generally resulted in expected non-significant or significant (p < 0.05) treatment effects. The ratings appeared to be more realistic than simply testing for changes in predictive soil quality indicators in response to management goals for reclaimed soils. SQF also proved to be useful for quantitatively defining equivalent capability functions for reclaimed soils, assessing quality of both dry- and wet-land reclaimed soils and are suitable for monitoring the quality of reclamation covers through all phases of restoration.

• Subjects / Keywords

  • soil organic carbon
  • soil quality
  • soil quality-scoring function
  • land reclamation

• Graduation date

  Spring 2018

• Type of Item

  Thesis

• Degree

  Doctor of Philosophy

• DOI

  https://doi.org/10.7939/R30Z71B8X

• License

  Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.