Usage
  • 40 views
  • 24 downloads

Two Papers on the Cost Effectiveness of Conservation Programs

  • Author / Creator
    Noga, Warren M
  • This study explores the cost effectiveness of conservation offsets and three different methods of obtaining conservation easements. Given limited conservation dollars, conservation programs should be designed a cost effective manner. A new framework for evaluating offset programs is developed and applied to seven offset programs. A detailed study of an offset pilot program in Alberta is presented in Chapter 3, including calculations of the transactions costs and stakeholder perceptions. An analysis of three methods of obtaining a conservation easement, including a novel method using land purchase and re-sale, is presented in Chapter 4. The results presented in Chapter 3 show that transactions costs can be proportionally large, but do not necessarily affect perceptions on the cost effectiveness of conservation offsets. Results from the conservation easement paper show that a new approach employing land purchase and re-sale can provide a low cost method of obtaining easements in low discount rate scenarios. Both studies yield policy implications, which are synthesized in the conclusion.

  • Subjects / Keywords
  • Graduation date
    2014-11
  • Type of Item
    Thesis
  • Degree
    Master of Science
  • DOI
    https://doi.org/10.7939/R3M96T
  • License
    This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for non-commercial purposes. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
  • Language
    English
  • Institution
    University of Alberta
  • Degree level
    Master's
  • Department
    • Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology
  • Specialization
    • Agricultural and Resource Economics
  • Supervisor / co-supervisor and their department(s)
    • Adamowicz, Vic (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
  • Examining committee members and their departments
    • Unterschultz, Jim (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
    • Jeffrey, Scott (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
    • Adamowicz, Vic (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
    • Boxall, Peter (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)