ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Corridors may not improve the conservation value of small reserves for most boreal birdsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3804XP2Z

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Biological Sciences, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Biological Sciences)

Corridors may not improve the conservation value of small reserves for most boreal birds Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Hannon, S. J.
Schmiegelow, F. K. A.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Habitat generalists
Reserve size
Old-forest specialists
Landscape connectivity
Fragmentation
Boreal birds
Conservation value
Gap sensitivity
Clearcuts
Corridors
Boreal mixedwood forest
Logging
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Abstract. Building or maintaining corridors in fragmented landscapes may be an important method to conserve gap-sensitive species that avoid crossing gaps in forest cover. We tested the effectiveness of corridors by examining the changes in abundance of boreal birds pre- and post-logging in experimental 10-ha and 40-ha reserves that were isolated or connected by corridors, relative to their abundance responses in continuous forest (reference sites). Prior to the analysis, we categorized birds as to their predicted gap sensitivity based on two measures: their use of corridors and gap-crossing behavior in small-scale trials, and their habitat affinities (forest species vs. habitat generalists). The abundance of forest species as a group was consistently higher in reference reserves than in isolated or connected reserves after harvest, except for the first year after harvest, when crowding occurred in isolates. Habitat generalist species showed no differences in abundances across reserve types. As a group, resident species were more abundant in reference and connected reserves than in isolates in three of five years post-harvest, suggesting that corridors might benefit these species. None of the single species analyzed showed consistent evidence of benefiting from corridors. Although four species were most abundant in connected reserves after harvest, their abundances were not significantly lower in isolates than in reference sites. Behavioral classification (gap-crossing propensity) was not useful in classifying single species as to how gap sensitive they would be in response to our experiment: habitat affinity was a better predictor. We suggest that corridors may be useful to retain resident birds on harvested landscapes, but that corridors connecting small reserves of forest are unlikely to offset the impacts of fragmentation for most boreal birds. Assessments of the utility of corridors must, however, be done in the context of the full plant and animal communities that live in the boreal forest.
Date created
2002
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3804XP2Z
License information
Rights
© 2002 Ecological Society of America. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
Hannon, S. J., & Schmiegelow, F. K. A. (2002). Corridors may not improve the conservation value of small reserves for most boreal birds. Ecological Applications, 12(5), 1457-1468.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-28T21:25:46.911+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3880831
Last modified: 2015:10:12 17:13:54-06:00
Filename: EA_12_2002_1457.pdf
Original checksum: 9e3714b2a1a7dacf256586cba979d24a
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Improperly formed date offset=3879430
File title: ecap_12_513.1457_1468.tp
File author: penta
Page count: 12
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date