ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Screening for post-traumatic stress disorder after injury in the pediatric emergency department -  a systematic review protocolDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3JM23N4G

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Emergency Medicine, Department of
Pediatrics, Department of
Women and Children's Health Research Institute

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Emergency Medicine
Reviews (Emergency Medicine)

Screening for post-traumatic stress disorder after injury in the pediatric emergency department - a systematic review protocol Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Odenbach, Jeffrey
Newton, Amanda
Gokiert, Rebecca
Falconer, Cathy
Courchesne, Craig
Campbell, Sandy
Curtis, Sarah J.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Emergency department
PTSD - Pediatrics
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Screening Instruments
Articles
Pediatric Injury
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Abstract Background: Pediatric injury is highly prevalent and has significant impact both physically and emotionally. The majority of pediatric injuries are treated in emergency departments (EDs), where treatment of physical injuries is the main focus. In addition to physical trauma, children often experience significant psychological trauma, and the development of acute stress disorder (ASD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common. The consequences of failing to recognize and treat children with ASD and PTSD are significant and extend into adulthood. Currently, screening guidelines to identify children at risk for developing these stress disorders are not evident in the pediatric emergency setting. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize evidence on the psychometric properties, diagnostic accuracy, and clinical utility of screening tools that identify or predict PTSD secondary to physical injury in children. Specific research objectives are to: (1) identify, describe, and critically evaluate instruments available to screen for PTSD in children; (2) review and synthesize the test-performance characteristics of these tools; and (3) describe the clinical utility of these tools with focus on ED suitability. Methods: Computerized databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science and PsycINFO will be searched in addition to conference proceedings, textbooks, and contact with experts. Search terms will include MeSH headings (post-traumatic stress or acute stress), (pediatric or children) and diagnosis. All articles will be screened by title/abstract and articles identified as potentially relevant will be retrieved in full text and assessed by two independent reviewers. Quality assessment will be determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Screening tool characteristics, including type of instrument, number of items, administration time and training administrators level, will be extracted as well as gold standard diagnostic reference properties and any quantitative diagnostic data (specificity, positive and negative likelihood/odds ratios) where appropriate. Discussion: Identifying screening tools to recognize children at risk of developing stress disorders following trauma is essential in guiding early treatment and minimizing long-term sequelae of childhood stress disorders. This review aims to identify such screening tools in efforts to improve routine stress disorder screening in the pediatric ED setting.
Date created
2014/03/01
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3JM23N4G
License information
This is an Open Access article distributed...
Rights
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-06-14T05:42:35.552+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 149094
Last modified: 2015:10:12 19:06:35-06:00
Filename: 2046-4053-3-19 (2).pdf
Original checksum: 5d0979f4a7f7983c7c26e75e4e4b5151
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=3966
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=3966
Status message: Invalid Annotation property offset=3966
Status message: Invalid outline dictionary item offset=129538
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date