ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Labeling of Genetically Modified Organisms: Law, Science, Policy and PracticeDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3PR7N28X

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Labeling of Genetically Modified Organisms: Law, Science, Policy and Practice Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Convention on Biological Diversity
Mandatory labelling
WTO
Labelling threshold
CODEX
Scientific evidence
Genetically Mofidied Organism trade conflicts
Consumer's right to know
Voluntary labelling
Truthful advertising
Precautionary Principle
Consumers' willingness to pay
Labelling of Genetically Modified Organisms
FAO
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Du, Li
Supervisor and department
Caulfield, Timothy (Faculty of Law)
Reif, Linda (Faculty of Law)
Examining committee member and department
McHughen, Alan (College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of California, UC Riverside)
Griener, Glenn (Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts)
An, Henry (Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Science)
Nelson, Erin (Faculty of Law)
Department
Faculty of Law
Specialization

Date accepted
2014-09-03T15:22:08Z
Graduation date
2014-11
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
The labelling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been the subject of a global debate for decades. This dissertation, by conducting comprehensive and inter-disciplinary research – from legal, scientific, political and practical perspectives, aims to provide an in-depth analysis of fundamental factors that have contributed to the formation of different labelling regimes, and to justify claims of significant concerns that an optimal labelling regime should be based on and protect. It finds that not only rationales for a mandatory GMO labelling system cannot be justified but also the implementation of mandatory labelling measures may trigger a number of pragmatic problems. It is worth noting that mandatory GMO labelling measures, which lead to conflicts in global agricultural trade, might well violate WTO trade law obligations that are binding on Canada, China, the EU and the US etc. Based on these findings, this study supports voluntary labelling requirements and stands in sharp contrast to the mandatory labelling regimes implemented by the EU and other jurisdictions. It argues that three conditions should be considered to establish an optimal GMO domestic labelling regime. They are: (1) the regime must be based on scientific evidence; (2) it must employ scientific risk assessment and management as the basis for labelling requirements; and (3) the labelling should be accurate and the mission of GMO labelling should be primarily to protect the health of consumers. It thereby suggests that the mandatory labelling requirement should be abandoned in all jurisdictions, and replaced with a voluntary labelling regime and a globally harmonized system of GMO approval procedures and detection methods. The dissertation ends with some lessons drawn from the current GMO labelling controversies to ensure better management of future GMO labelling conflicts and regulation of new agricultural biotechnology. It offers suggestions for perfecting the current Canadian GMO labelling regime.  
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3PR7N28X
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-01-08T08:01:24.489+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 2998209
Last modified: 2015:10:12 17:11:34-06:00
Filename: Du_Li_201408_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: 51f6c0bb3d930664e2b3c4a3c86cd0a1
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date