ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Testing an Alternative Eddy Viscosity SchemeDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3MP4VW39

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Testing an Alternative Eddy Viscosity Scheme Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Atmospheric boundary layer
Eddy Viscosity
Turbulence closure
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Marshall, Ginny A
Supervisor and department
Wilson, John (Earth and Atmospheric Sciences)
Examining committee member and department
Myers, Paul (Earth and Atmospheric Sciences)
Reuter, Gerhard (Earth and Atmospheric Sciences)
Department
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Specialization

Date accepted
2015-08-04T14:21:05Z
Graduation date
2015-11
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the performance of an alternative eddy viscosity scheme proposed by Wilson (2012) for use in single column models of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). More popular schemes parameterize eddy viscosity as a function of turbulent kinetic energy, since turbulent mixing should increase as turbulent kinetic energy increases. However, it is an implication of Taylor’s (1921) Lagrangian theory of dispersion that time and velocity scales relevant to eddy viscosity are functions of vertical velocity statistics. As such, vertical statistics are seemingly a more sensible choice when parameterizing eddy viscosity; thus, the scheme proposed parameterizes eddy viscosity as a function of vertical velocity variance and an empirical time scale. In this thesis, the new scheme has been tested against an experiment that was conducted in Kansas in 1999 during the Cooperative Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Study in 1999 (CASES- 99) (Poulos et al., 2002). The protocol for the test is identical to that outlined by Svensson et al. (2011) which has been used to compare the performance of various ABL closure models. The test was run for 59 hours and model results were compared to observations, model results from a scheme proposed by B´elair et al. (1999), and results presented by Svensson et al. (2011). Results show that the alternative scheme performs reasonably well, comparable to many schemes presented by Svensson et al. (2011), and no worse than B´elair’s scheme, although it may not erode the stable surface inversion fast enough. Modeled 10 m wind speed, turbulent kinetic energy, friction velocity and sensible heat flux show a delayed response to the driving surface warming which is evident in the 3-4 hour lag observed in the increase of these quantities during the transition from the stable morning to the turbulent afternoon. Unfortunately the experiment was performed for only one full diurnal cycle, so it cannot be concluded that the problem lies in the model parameterization; therefore, further testing is required.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3MP4VW39
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-08-04T20:21:06.076+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 914444
Last modified: 2016:06:24 17:57:27-06:00
Filename: Marshall_Ginny_A_201507_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: ccd8a962634712928af9892f4d9fd145
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date