ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Evaluation of Hydraulic Excavator and Rope Shovel Major Maintenance Costs in OperationDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3NV99N8W

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Evaluation of Hydraulic Excavator and Rope Shovel Major Maintenance Costs in Operation Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
mining shovel
operational costs
performance parameters
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Andreev, Rodion
Supervisor and department
Joseph, Tim (Civil and Environmental Engineering)
Examining committee member and department
Wei Victor Liu (School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering)
Joseph, Tim (School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering)
Al-Hussein, Mohamed (Construction Engineering and Management)
Department
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Specialization
Mining Engineering
Date accepted
2015-08-11T13:57:03Z
Graduation date
2015-11
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
In this thesis, results of a comparison study of rope shovels and hydraulic excavators undertaken by the author between September 2014 and May 2015 is presented. The study was implemented by a literature search, collecting data from KMG (Komatsu Mining Germany) which is the Komatsu Limited manufacturing facility for super large hydraulic mining shovels (16 to 42m3 Bucket Capacity) in Europe, and receiving and analyzing information from a coal mining company about performance parameters of rope and hydraulic shovels with bucket capacities ranging from 10 up to 33m3. The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of two types of excavators in surface mining during their life cycle from 0 up to 60,000 operational hours. Each machine performance was surveyed on a month by month basis and involved assessing such parameters as: operational hours, scheduled inspections and maintenance, unscheduled repairs, number of failures, production. Consequently it allowed calculating general indicators to have to be priced in the study and their change with increase of total operational life. These indicators were: physical availability and hourly output of an excavator (normalized to 1m3 of bucket capacity). Moreover, expenditures related to possession of mining shovels (spare parts, fuels, lubricants, electricity, consumables) were also taken into consideration to calculate and compare life cycle costs of machines.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3NV99N8W
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-08-11T19:57:06.245+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 5011931
Last modified: 2016:06:24 17:17:22-06:00
Filename: Andreev_Rodion_201508_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 69c3209b85eb585460c3b57da9b31b25
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date