ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Scholarly editions in print and on the screen: A theoretical comparisonDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3W37M833

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Humanities Computing Program

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Humanities Computing)

Scholarly editions in print and on the screen: A theoretical comparison Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Sondheim, Daniel
Rockwell, Geoffrey
Ruecker, Stan
Ilovan, Mihaela
Frizzera, Luciano
Windsor, Jennifer
Additional contributors
INKE Research Group
Subject/Keyword
Digital Humanities
Interface Design
Media Studies
Scholarly Editions
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Since the advent of digital scholarly editions, there have been many arguments to the effect that digital versions are able to offer more to humanities scholars than printed ones. Though this opinion is shared by most scholars producing digital editions, a number have also published printed versions alongside or even after launching digital ones. To address the apparent contradiction between theoretical discourse and actual practice, this chapter will analyze two scholarly editions that have been implemented in both digital and printed environments by the same editor(s). Scholarly editions that we intend to focus on include the British Library, National Library of Russia, St. Catherine's Monastery, and Leipzig University Library's edition of the Codex Sinaiticus, and Daniel Paul O'Donnell's edition of Cædmon's hymn. By comparing statements of purpose, interface features, and content, we will identify the structures and characteristics that are either shared or unique in each edition. Having conducted a detailed analysis of each edition, we will then evaluate each scholarly edition by applying to it a relevant theory of new media. Theories that we will use include Lev Manovich's The language of new media, and Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin's Remediation: Understanding new media. A view of the scholarly edition as a particular instance within the broader context of current media theory will thereby be developed. The vantage point thus obtained will allow for a more moderate evaluation of the relative advantages and disadvantages of printed and digital scholarly editions than has been available thus far.
Date created
2015
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3W37M833
License information
Attribution 4.0 International
Rights

Citation for previous publication
Sondheim, D., Rockwell, G., Ruecker, S., Ilovan, M., Frizzera, L., and Windsor, J. (2015). Scholarly editions in print and on the screen: A theoretical comparison. Digital Studies / Le champ numérique, 6(), .
Source

Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3552319
Last modified: 2017:09:05 16:39:28-06:00
Filename: DSLCN_6_14.pdf
Original checksum: 0f4f245ed5c3882ce16a398e0e3aebed
Well formed: true
Valid: true
Page count: 14
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date