ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of What Happens to Marriage after Stroke?Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3PC2TN1J

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

What Happens to Marriage after Stroke? Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
grounded theory
life course
transitions
symbolic interaction
marriage
stroke
wellbeing
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Anderson, Sharon D
Supervisor and department
Johnson, Matthew (Human Ecology)
Wilson, Donna (Nursing)
Keating, Norah (Human Ecology)
Examining committee member and department
Roberto, Karen A. (Health Sciences, Virginia Tech)
Low, Gail (Nursing)
Department
Department of Human Ecology
Specialization

Date accepted
2017-03-28T08:44:04Z
Graduation date
2017-06:Spring 2017
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
Abstract Background: Family transitions such as the birth of children and retirement often necessitate a redefinition of the marriage relationship, as other roles are added or changed. Stroke is a common, and also a particularly difficult, transition for a married couple. In a third of marriages that have experienced stroke, both survivors and their spouses report they are dissatisfied with their lives. Marital relationships, however, seem to be a strength for many such couples. Purpose: This dissertation responds to the need to understand how stroke survivors and spouses regard their marital relationships in the context of impairments from stroke and the survivors’ need for care. Methods: The dissertation consists of: (1) a systematic literature review that answers the research question “What is the current state of knowledge about what happens to a couple’s marital relationship after one partner has suffered a stroke?” and (2) a grounded theory qualitative study of interviews with 18 couples that answers the questions “What happens to marriage in the context of care after stroke?” and “What are the key elements related to marriage stability or breakdown after stroke?” Findings: Three research gaps were apparent in the literature review: how survivors and spouses characterize their post-stroke roles and marriages, the ways in which couples reorganize their marriages after stroke, and the impact of marriage, particularly a satisfying marriage, on the caregiver burden and the survivor’s functional recovery after stroke. My empirical study revealed that at homecoming after stroke, the initial work involved role management for caregivers and care receivers. The work of realigning the husband and wife role-identities to fit the caregiving and care receiving contexts was a second post-stroke transition. To make this transition, couples had to rethink the meaning of their relationship in the new context of care and disability. Three distinct types of marriages evolved from these processes: the couple’s relationship was reconfirmed around the pre-stroke marriage relationship; the couple’s relationship was recalibrated around care; the couple existed in a parallel relationship. I identified three themes related to the reconstruction or breakdown of the marital identity: feeling overwhelmed, resolving conflict, and perceiving value in the marriage. Conclusion: Marriage relationships are not peripheral to survivors’ and spouses’ outcomes after stroke; rather, marriage is fundamental to the management of impairments and to the wellbeing of the couple.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3PC2TN1J
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2017-03-28T14:44:04.971+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1654610
Last modified: 2017:06:13 12:18:02-06:00
Filename: Anderson_Sharon_D_201703_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: f5c2b5d5606dc5ad38340eb029fd4325
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date