ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Bare-bones Paleontology: An Examination of the Systematic Methods Used in Vertebrate Paleontology and their Congruence with Avian IchnotaxonomyDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3QR4NW2Z

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Bare-bones Paleontology: An Examination of the Systematic Methods Used in Vertebrate Paleontology and their Congruence with Avian Ichnotaxonomy Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Cladistics
Paleontology
Systematics
Ichnotaxonomy
Statistics
Footprints
Avian
Osteology
Vertebrate
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Buckley, Lisa G
Supervisor and department
Currie, Philip J (Biological Sciences)
Examining committee member and department
Larsson, Hans (Redpath Museum, Biology, McGill University)
Murray, Alison (Biological Sciences)
Gingras, Murray (Earth and Atmospheric Sciences)
Sperling, Felix A.H. (Biological Sciences)
Paszkowski, Cynthia (Biological Sciences)
Department
Department of Biological Sciences
Specialization
Systematics and Evolution
Date accepted
2016-01-11T10:29:48Z
Graduation date
2016-06
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
Data used in the systematic paleontology of extinct vertebrates is limited to what can be collected from detailed comparisons of preserved anatomy. This restricts vertebrate paleontologists to those characters preserved on osteological specimens. Furthermore, parataxonomies such as ichnotaxonomy use different morphologic criteria for assigning tracks and trackways to ichnogeneric and ichnospecific levels. For taxa with no extant representatives, it is difficult to ascertain whether the osteologic characters used are consistent in their ability to discern among closely-related or morphologically-similar vertebrates. It is also difficult to determine the strength of congruence between osteology-based systematics and those taxonomic methods using criteria other than osteology data. Phylogenetic relationships of higher-level taxonomic groupings using morphologic data on appendicular skeletal elements do not necessarily correlate with those relationships recovered using molecular data; while the genus-level groupings are (in the case of Accipiter, Charadrius, Ciconiidae, Falco, Grus, Parapavo, Tringa) retained by appendicular skeletal synapomorphies, similar groupings recovered by other morphologic phylogenetic analyses conflict with evolutionary hypotheses recovered by molecular phylogenies. Regardless of the lack of congruence between molecular and morphologic phylogenies, there is increased osteologic information from the morphology of the distal tarsometatarus of Aves that can be used to increase the accuracy of avian ichnotaxonomy. Specifically, the plantar displacement of the trochlear surfaces of metarsals II and IV is greater in Aves than in non-avian theropods, even in avian taxa whose distal tarsometatarsal morphology shares convergent features with non-avian theropods, such as size. Multivariate statistical analyses are demonstrated to be an additional tool to successfully test the relationships between avian osteomorphology and avian ichnotaxonomy. The statistically significant difference in the degree of plantar rotation in distal tarsometatarsals II and IV between Charadriidae and Scolopacidae, correlating with the significantly different digit splay in the footprints of these two families of shorebirds, demonstrates that osteomorphology and ichnomorphology can be used to increase the ichnotaxonomic resolution of Cretaceous-age avian footprints. It is likely that the differences in plantar displacement and torsion of metatarsals II and IV between avian and non-avian theropods, and its effects on the footprints of the respective trackmakers, will prove to be reliable synapomorphy-based characters that can be utilited in ichnotaxonomy to distinguish between the traces of large avian and small non-avian theropods.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3QR4NW2Z
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication
Buckley, L. G., R. T. McCrea, and M. G. Lockley. 2015. Birding by foot: a critical look at the synapomorphy- and phenetic-based approaches to trackmaker identification of enigmatic tridactyl Mesozoic traces. Ichnos 22(3–4):192–207.Buckley, L. G., R. T. McCrea, and M. G. Lockley. In press. Analysing and resolving Cretaceous avian ichnotaxonomy using multivariate statistical analyses: approaches and results, in Richter A (ed.), Dinosaur Tracks Volume, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA: 39p.Xing, L., L. G. Buckley, R. T. McCrea, M. G. Lockley, J. Zhang, L. Piñuela, H. Klein, and F. Wang. 2015. Reanalysis of Wupus agilis (Early Cretaceous) of Chongqing, China as a large avian trace: differentiating between large bird and small theropod tracks. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0124039. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124039

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-01-11T17:29:59.087+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 40496999
Last modified: 2016:06:16 16:45:37-06:00
Filename: Buckley_Lisa_G_201512_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: 41033a18fa751fa008637712a988820d
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date