ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Climbing on the Bandwagon of Idiomatic Variation: A Multi-Methodological ApproachDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3222RB4F

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Climbing on the Bandwagon of Idiomatic Variation: A Multi-Methodological Approach Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Idiomatic Variation
Multiple Methods
Idioms
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Geeraert, Kristina D.
Supervisor and department
Newman, John (Linguistics)
Baayen, R. Harald (Linguistics)
Examining committee member and department
Järvikivi, Juhani (Linguistics)
Titone, Debra (Psychology)
Baayen, R. Harald (Linguistics)
Newman, John (Linguistics)
Colston, Herbert (Linguistics)
Department
Department of Linguistics
Specialization

Date accepted
2016-01-26T08:24:07Z
Graduation date
2016-06
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
Idioms have traditionally been regarded as ‘frozen’ expressions, which are fixed in form. But recent corpus-based research has shown that idioms can occur with a range of variation (cf. Moon, 1998; Barlow, 2000; Duffley, 2013; Schröder, 2013), from lexical variation (e.g. shake in one’s boots/shoes), to integrated concepts (e.g. make rapid headway) to partial or truncated forms (e.g. the fat lady is warming up). Few studies however have explored idiomatic variation from an experimental perspective (cf. Gibbs and Nayak, 1989; Gibbs et al., 1989a; McGlone et al., 1994). This dissertation attempts to fill that gap by investigating idiomatic variation using multiple methods. In one study, speakers were asked to rate the acceptability of several types of idiomatic variation to determine speaker preferences for particular variants. These same variants were also presented to participants in an eye-tracking study to determine if certain types of variants are easier to interpret and understand. Finally, speakers were asked to produce idiom variants in an elicitation task specifically designed to encourage creativity. These studies show that some variants, such as integrated concepts (e.g. pull the political strings), are produced quite frequently in the elicitation task and judged to be more acceptable in the ratings task, but show significantly longer fixations on the idiom as a whole due to the additional information. Other types of variants however, such as lexical variation (e.g. tug the strings), are less preferred and produced less often, but do not show longer reading times than the canonical form. A fourth study collected the transparency ratings of idioms in their canonical form to determine whether the meaning as a whole influenced variation. Idioms in general are rated as more acceptable if they are also considered to be more transparent, but transparency was not found to be predictive of variation. The results from this study reveal that idioms have a much greater potential for variation than is often assumed. Idioms can be utilized with a considerable range of variation and yet are still interpretable with their idiomatic meanings. This study thus leads to a view of idioms as being not so much different from non-idiomatic or ‘literal’ language, even if idioms tend to convey semantically richer information.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3222RB4F
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-01-26T15:24:14.702+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 2676269
Last modified: 2016:06:16 17:01:09-06:00
Filename: Geeraert_Kristina_D_201601_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: 485e88685f032770097ff6d83e75ec68
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date