Download the full-sized PDF of Biological communities and ecosystem function in restored and natural prairie wetlandsDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of


This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Biological communities and ecosystem function in restored and natural prairie wetlands Open Access


Other title
Prairie wetlands
Ecosystem function
Type of item
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Bortolotti, Lauren E
Supervisor and department
St. Louis, Vincent (Biological Sciences)
Vinebrooke, Rolf (Biological Sciences)
Examining committee member and department
Proctor, Heather (Biological Sciences)
Tank, Suzanne (Biological Sciences)
Foote, Lee (Renewable Resources)
Christopher Solomon (Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies)
Department of Biological Sciences
Date accepted
Graduation date
2016-06:Fall 2016
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Prairie wetlands provide many important ecosystem services including supporting biodiversity, improving water quality, preventing erosion, recharging groundwater, and attenuating floods. However, more than half of prairie wetlands in North America have been lost, primarily due to drainage for agriculture. Restoration may be able to reestablish lost services, although there remain substantial gaps in our understanding of the recovery of biodiversity and ecosystem function in restored prairie wetlands. Here, I present an investigation characterizing biological communities and ecosystem function in restored and natural prairie wetlands in southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada. My first objective was to assess recovery of the abiotic environment (water chemistry, sediment organic carbon [OC]) and various biological communities (phytoplankton, sediment diatoms, zooplankton, benthic macroinvertebrates, submersed aquatic vegetation [SAV]) after hydrological restoration. I used a space-for-time experimental design, surveying “recently restored” (restored 1-3 years before study), “older restored” (restored 7-14 years before study), and “natural” (never drained) prairie wetlands. Recently restored wetlands differed from older restored and natural wetlands in that they had higher total phosphorus (TP) and dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2) but lower specific conductance, pH, and sediment OC. Phytoplankton, diatom, and zooplankton communities showed little relationship to restoration state, but taxonomic composition of macroinvertebrate and SAV communities were different in recently restored wetlands. The consistent resemblance of older restored wetlands to natural wetlands suggests that recovery of the abiotic environment and many biological communities is possible within ~10 years of restoration, a result with direct implications for management. I quantified greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes from the open water of three restored and natural prairie wetlands and used both CO2 fluxes and net ecosystem production (NEP; measured using the diel oxygen technique) to assess the metabolic status (i.e., net autotrophic or heterotrophic) of prairie wetlands. GHG emissions tended to be high, but variable. The recently restored wetland emitted more CO2 and methane than either the older restored or natural wetland, and only the latter showed extensive CO2 uptake. CO2 supersaturation was a less reliable indicator of wetland metabolic status than NEP, especially at daily timescales, owing to the confounding influence of geochemical processes on CO2 concentrations. I measured ecosystem metabolism, including NEP, gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in three restored and natural prairie wetlands and identified the drivers of these rates. PAR, temperature, proxies of water column stratification, and SAV abundance were the main drivers of metabolism within wetlands. However, the recently restored wetland differed from the other sites in that chlorophyll a (chl a) and TP were also drivers of GPP and NEP. Among-wetland differences in NEP rates were determined by a combination of wetland state (i.e., clear water or turbid) and the degree to which emergent vegetation subsidized ER. GPP and ER were highest in the older restored wetland followed by the natural and recently restored wetlands. The GPP gradient across sites was explained by the abundance of SAV whereas the ER gradient by the abundance of substrates for microbial respiration (dissolved organic carbon, sediment OC). To date, this body of research represents one of the most comprehensive examinations of the recovery of biological communities after wetland restoration in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region and is the first to look at ecosystem metabolism in this system. My work suggests that many attributes of prairie wetlands recover after restoration, though more work is needed to better characterize the effects of restoration on ecosystem metabolism and to understand how broadly applicable these findings are to the rest of the Prairie Pothole Region.
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication
Bortolotti LE, St. Louis VL, Vinebrooke RD, Wolfe AP. 2016. Net ecosystem production and carbon greenhouse gas fluxes in three prairie wetlands. Ecosystems 19: 411-425.Bortolotti LE, Vinebrooke RD, St. Louis VL. in press. Prairie wetland communities recover at different rates following hydrological restoration. Freshwater Biology.

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 6316606
Last modified: 2016:11:16 12:59:00-07:00
Filename: Bortolotti_Lauren_E_201609_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: 201e19416f6ae1ac6a9f269e28a5b3b4
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date