ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Risk construction at a public hearing: an application of socio-cultural theories into organizational riskDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3864X

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Risk construction at a public hearing: an application of socio-cultural theories into organizational risk Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
organizational risk
public hearing
socio-cultural theory
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Topal, Cagri
Supervisor and department
Gephart, Robert P. (Strategic Management and Organization)
Examining committee member and department
Deephouse, David L. (Strategic Management and Organization)
Suddaby, Roy (Strategic Management and Organization)
Garvin, Theresa D. (Earth and Atmospheric Sciences)
Mills, Albert J. (Management)
Department
Faculty of Business
Specialization

Date accepted
2011-06-27T14:57:05Z
Graduation date
2011-11
Degree
Organizational Analysis
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
This study poses the question of how different stakeholders construct or give meaning to an organizational project as an organizational risk. The goal is to analyze the meaning construction process by applying socio-cultural theories to an empirical organizational setting, and extend and enrich organizational research and theory on risk. The research setting is a public hearing into a proposal for drilling a sour oil well within a residential area in Edmonton, Alberta. First, the study develops a multi-faceted perspective on the process of giving meaning to organizational risk, which complements and extends the existing insights in organizational literature. It provides theoretical insights into how social actors define risk boundaries, how they refer to common and different social rationalities to understand risk, how they use rational and ritualistic risk management instruments, how they engage in relations of communication, power, legitimacy, and individualization to interpret risk, and how societal and institutional contexts affect risk meanings. Second, the study applies socio-cultural theories into an empirical organizational setting where social actors interpret risks produced by an organization and shows the potential of these theories for organizational risk research. The study indicates that the concepts derived from these theories can be used as sensitizing frameworks to analyze and elaborate on organizational risk and to ground the theories in empirical settings and data. Third, the study highlights inequalities between different social actors in their capacity to participate in settings like public hearings where they give meaning to and decide on risks produced by organizations, and the consequences of those inequalities in terms of risk distribution for different social actors and society at large. The study shows that public hearings in Alberta should be radically transformed to allow effective participation and representation of public stakeholders as well as deliberation on organizational projects and risks. Business practitioners should develop ongoing relations with local public stakeholders for effective risk management.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3864X
Rights
License granted by cagri topal (ctopal@ualberta.ca) on 2011-06-27T07:08:28Z (GMT): Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of the above terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis, and except as herein provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-29T20:16:55.314+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1975491
Last modified: 2015:10:12 11:22:30-06:00
Filename: Topal_Cagri_Fall 2011.pdf
Original checksum: dc99b04986af9be639b88d36b4739bd3
Well formed: true
Valid: true
Status message: Too many fonts to report; some fonts omitted. Total fonts = 1391
File author: School of Business
Page count: 393
File language: en-US
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date