ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Exploring Preferences for Poplar Biotechnology and Integrated Choice Latent Variable ModelsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R39K4650R

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Exploring Preferences for Poplar Biotechnology and Integrated Choice Latent Variable Models Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Latent Variables
Public Preference
Genomics
Choice Model
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Rollins, Curtis
Supervisor and department
Marty Luckert (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
Boxall, Peter (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
Examining committee member and department
Boxall, Peter (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
Scott Jeffrey (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
Howie Harshaw (Physical Education and Recreation)
Marty Luckert (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
Sandeep Mohapatra (Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology)
Department
Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology
Specialization
Agricultural and Resource Economics
Date accepted
2015-04-10T13:09:49Z
Graduation date
2015-11
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
This thesis is divided in two papers, each focusing on a distinct issue. In the first paper (Chapter 2), public preferences for poplar biotechnology are examined in western Canada. Using a sample of the public from British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, respondents were asked to vote in a series of hypothetical referenda comparing proposed forest policies to the current policy. Proposed policies varied based on poplar breeding method (traditional, genomics, or genetic modification) and whether poplars may be used as a biofuel feedstock. British Columbians were least accepting of new policies promoting poplar biotechnology or genomics on public land, while Albertans were most accepting. Little variation in policy acceptance was noted between different breeding methods, though genetic modification is least preferred. Policies involving poplar-derived biofuel production were preferred to policies involving no biofuel production. Respondents who were more certain of their voting choice were less likely to prefer a proposed policy versus the current policy. The second paper (Chapter 3), examines an integrated choice latent variable (ICLV) model in comparison to other choice models. The ICLV model allows for simultaneous estimation of models of individuals’ latent attitudes and choices. While attitudes are often specified as observed covariates in the social sciences to gain explanatory power, this approach may result in biased estimates, which the ICLV model addresses. Using the Albertan data subset, the ICLV model is compared to a model specifying attitudes as observed variables (No ME model). No significant differences in effects on the choice outcome were detected between the No ME and ICLV models. However, the No ME model is prone to Type I and II errors when estimating the effects of demographic variables on the choice outcome. Thus, the largest benefit of the ICLV model seems to be its ability to estimate relationships between latent and observed variables.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R39K4650R
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-04-13T19:22:39.871+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 5176469
Last modified: 2016:06:24 17:08:28-06:00
Filename: Rollins_Curtis_201504_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 6ecba18de5c2f89d47858e023bfdf7b7
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date