- The Steampunk Aesthetic: Technofantasies in a Neo-Victorian Retrofuture
- Perschon, Mike D
- Sep 28, 2012 9:19 AM
- Adobe PDF
- 781123 bytes
- Despite its growing popularity in books, film, games, fashion, and décor, a suitable definition for steampunk remains elusive. Debates in online forums seek to arrive at a cogent definition, ranging from narrowly restricting and exclusionary definitions, to uselessly inclusive indefinitions. The difficulty in defining steampunk stems from the evolution of the term as a literary sub-genre of science fiction (SF) to a sub-culture of Goth fashion, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) arts and crafts movements, and more recently, as ideological counter-culture. Accordingly, defining steampunk unilaterally is challenged by what aspect of steampunk culture is being defined. Even the seminal steampunk texts of K.W. Jeter, Tim Powers, and James Blaylock lack strong affinities. In his review of Tachyon’s Steampunk anthology, Rob Latham observes a “wide range of tonal and ideological possibilities” in the book’s twelve short stories and novellas originally published between 1985 and 2007 (347). Steampunk works share a fantastic aesthetic that separates steampunk from neo-Victorian writing or just alternate history. Instead of viewing steampunk as a genre, steampunk might be considered an expression of features, which when combined, constitute a style or aesthetic surface. An understanding of steampunk as an aesthetic permits the requisite flexibility to discuss its diverse expressions. Employing an evidence-based, exploratory approach, this study identifies three components of the steampunk aesthetic: neo-Victorianism, technofantasy, and retrofuturism. Unlike attempts to list ostensibly common themes or archetypes of steampunk, or simply catalogue recurring motifs or settings, this study will argue that these three components are found in the majority of steampunk works. For the purposes of concision, this study restricts the exploration to literary works, demonstrating how the components of neo-victorianism, technofantasy and retrofuturism are best suited for defining steampunk, inclusively accommodating a variety of steampunk narratives while exclusively drawing boundaries to avoid rendering the term meaningless.
“Steampunk: Technofantasies in a neo-Victorian Retrofuture.” Postmodern Reinterpretations of Fairy Tales: How Applying New Methods Generates New Meanings. Ed. Anna Kérchy. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2011. 83-106. Print.
“Steam Wars.” Journal of Neo-Victorian Studies. 3:1 (2010): 127-166.
“Finding Nemo: Verne’s anti-hero as original Steampunk.” Verniana. North American Jules Verne Society. 2010. (16 pages) http://jv.gilead.org.il/studies/volumes/02/A4/Perschon.pdf
- Doctor of Philosophy
Office of Interdisciplinary Studies
- Fall 2012
- Sywenky, Irene (Office of Interdisciplinary Studies, Comparative Literature)
Hart, Jonathan (Comparative Literature, English and Film Studies)
Sinnema, Peter (English and Film Studies)
Verdiccio, Massimo (Comparative Literature)
Wharton, Thomas (English and Film Studies)
Tschofen, Monique (Communication and Culture, Ryerson)
Theses and Dissertations Spring 2009 to present
Office of Interdisciplinary Studies
Delete your item from era
Do you really want to delete "The Steampunk Aesthetic: Technofantasies in a Neo-Victorian Retrofuture" ?
Resotre your item to era
Do you really want to restore "The Steampunk Aesthetic: Technofantasies in a Neo-Victorian Retrofuture" ?
Purge your item from era
Do you really want to permanently delete "The Steampunk Aesthetic: Technofantasies in a Neo-Victorian Retrofuture" ?
Remove your item from era
Do you really want to remove "The Steampunk Aesthetic: Technofantasies in a Neo-Victorian Retrofuture" ?