ERA Banner
Download Add to Cart Share
More Like This
  • The development and biomechanics of theropod teeth and comparisons with other reptiles: a functional analysis
  • Reichel, Miriam
  • English
  • tooth
    enamel microstructures
    varanid lizard
    functional analysis
    multivariate analysis
  • Dec 22, 2011 10:52 AM
  • Thesis
  • English
  • Adobe PDF
  • 61322325 bytes
  • Teeth are important for taxonomic studies. They are often the only remains found of certain vertebrates in the fossil record. This is because they are more resistant to weathering than most bones, they are small, and they are generally abundant. Most reptiles have homodont dentition, and the study of their teeth was neglected for a long time due to the lack of structures that facilitate their taxonomic identification. Recently it has been shown that many reptiles have teeth with morphological traits that reliably allow them to be identified to a narrow range of taxonomic groups. Additionally, the study of function and morphometrics of teeth in theropods and other reptiles has shown potential for understanding feeding behaviors. The objectives of this thesis are to describe the function and biomechanics of theropod dinosaur teeth, and compare them to other reptiles. Detailed analyses of histological sections of theropod and varanid lizard teeth show that in both taxa carinal development starts before enamel deposition. A concentration of dentinal tubules near the posterior carinae of all taxa may be related to the presence of larger carinae and denticles on the posterior side of teeth. Finite element analyses of tooth crowns of tyrannosaurids, varanids and Stegosaurus, plus the enamel microstructures in various reptile teeth show that an increased bending resistance is observed in taxa with labiolingually thickened teeth and columnar enamel microstructures. Additionally, the morphometric analyses of tyrannosaurid teeth, and the variation of carinal placements along the tooth rows help quantifying heterodonty. The highest degree of heterodonty was found in Tyrannosaurus, and this could be a result of the gigantism observed in this taxon. In conclusion, carinae (and denticles) develop in a variety of different taxa for reasons including phylogenetic relationships, tooth proportions, and tooth biomechanics. Also, heterodonty in tyrannosaurids is quantifiable, and each tooth family produces teeth that are specialized for different functions. The innovative techniques developed for these studies allowed a new approach to the study of reptile teeth. As the search for good modern analogs to fossil taxa continues, comparisons with distantly related taxa show great potential for functional analyses, besides taxonomic studies.
  • Reichel, M. 2010. The heterodonty of Albertosaurus sarcophagus and Tyrannosaurus rex: biomechanical implications inferred through 3-D models. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 47: 1253–1261.
    Reichel, M. 2010. Case study: a model for the bite mechanics in Stegosaurus (Ornithischia, Stegosauridae). Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 103: 235–240.
  • Doctoral
  • Doctor of Philosophy
  • Department of Biological Sciences
  • Systematics and Evolution
  • Spring 2012
  • Currie, Philip J. (Biological Sciences)
  • Caldwell, Michael W. (Biological Sciences)
    Murray, Alison M. (Biological Sciences)
    Gingras, Murray K. (Earth and Atmospheric Sciences)
    Zelenitsky, Darla K. (Geoscience)

Apr 30, 2014 5:35 PM


Dec 22, 2011 10:52 AM


Kim Punko