ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Comparison of costs and associated outcomes between women choosing newly integrated autonomous midwifery care and matched controls: a pilot study.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3K649W1K

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Health Systems

Comparison of costs and associated outcomes between women choosing newly integrated autonomous midwifery care and matched controls: a pilot study. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
O'Brien, B.
Harvey, S.
Sommerfeldt, S.
Beischel, S.
Newburn-Cook, C.
Schopflocher, D.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
midwifery integration
maternal care
midwifery outcomes
midwifery costs
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
OBJECTIVE: In response to consumer demand and a critical shortage of Canadian maternity care providers, provinces have integrated or are in the process of integrating midwives into their health care systems. We compared the costs and outcomes of newly integrated, autonomous midwifery care with existing health care services in the province of Alberta. METHODS: Alberta Health and Wellness cost data from (1) physician fee-for-service, (2) outpatient, and (3) inpatient records, as well as outcome data from vital statistics records, were compared between participants in a midwifery integration project and individually matched women who received standard perinatal care during the same time period. Records of births occurring within the same time frame were matched according to risk score, maternal age, parity, and postal code. RESULTS: For women who chose midwifery care, an average saving of $1172 per course of care was realized without adversely affecting maternal or neonatal outcomes. Cost reductions are partially realized through provision of out-of-hospital health services. Women who chose midwifery care had more prenatal visits (P < 0.01) and fewer inductions of labour (P < 0.01); their babies had greater gestational ages (P < 0.05) and higher birth weights (P < 0.05) than controls. The sample size was insufficient to compare events associated with extremely high costs, or rare or catastrophic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Regulated and publicly funded midwifery care appears to be an effective intervention for low-risk women who make this choice. When compared with existing care, autonomous care by newly integrated midwives does not increase health care costs.
Date created
2010
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3K649W1K
License information
Rights
© 2010 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
O'Brien B , Harvey S , Sommerfeldt S , Beischel S , Newburn-Cook C , Schopflocher D. Comparison of costs and associated outcomes between women choosing newly integrated autonomous midwifery care and matched controls: a pilot study. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstétrique et gynécologie du Canada : JOGC 32.7 (2010).
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-28T21:31:49.242+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 128450
Last modified: 2015:10:12 16:45:35-06:00
Filename: JOGC_2010_32_7.pdf
Original checksum: 50fd987f0fec9fb17789cd7da5eabe4f
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=3123
Page count: 7
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date