ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Ocular Gene Transfer in the Spotlight: Implications of Newspaper Content for Clinical CommunicationsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3GH9BC77

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

School of Public Health

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Department of Public Health Sciences

Ocular Gene Transfer in the Spotlight: Implications of Newspaper Content for Clinical Communications Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Benjaminy, Shelly
Bubela, Tania
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Media
Newspaper coverage
Ethics
Informed consent
Therapeutic misconception
Gene transfer
Gene therapy
Type of item
Research Material
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Background Ocular gene transfer clinical trials are raising hopes for blindness treatments and attracting media attention. News media provide an accessible health information source for patients and the public, but are often criticized for overemphasizing benefits and underplaying risks of novel biomedical interventions. Overly optimistic portrayals of unproven interventions may influence public and patient expectations; the latter may cause patients to downplay risks and over-emphasize benefits, with implications for informed consent for clinical trials. We analyze the news media communications landscape about ocular gene transfer and make recommendations for improving communications between clinicians and potential trial participants in light of media coverage. Methods We analyzed leading newspaper articles about ocular gene transfer (1990-2012) from United States (n = 55), Canada (n = 26), and United Kingdom (n = 77) from Factiva and Canadian Newsstand databases using pre-defined coding categories. We evaluated the content of newspaper articles about ocular gene transfer for hereditary retinopathies, exploring representations of framing techniques, research design, risks/benefits, and translational timelines. Results The dominant frame in 61% of stories was a celebration of progress, followed by human-interest in 30% of stories. Missing from the positive frames were explanations of research design; articles conflated clinical research with treatment. Conflicts-of-interest and funding sources were similarly omitted. Attention was directed to the benefits of gene transfer, while risks were only reported in 43% of articles. A range of visual outcomes was described from slowing vision loss to cure, but the latter was the most frequently represented even though it is clinically infeasible. Despite the prominence of visual benefit portrayals, 87% of the articles failed to provide timelines for the commencement of clinical trials or for clinical implementation. Conclusions Our analysis confirms that despite many initiatives to improve media communications about experimental biotechnologies, media coverage remains overly optimistic and omits important information. In light of these findings, our recommendations focus on the need for clinicians account for media coverage in their communications with patients, especially in the context of clinical trial enrolment. The development of evidence-based communication strategies will facilitate informed consent and promote the ethical translation of this biotechnology.
Date created
2014/10/24
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3GH9BC77
License information
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication
Benjaminy S, Bubela T (2014) Ocular Gene Transfer in the Spotlight: Implications of Newspaper Content for Clinical Communications. BMC Medical Ethics 15(1):58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-58
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-10-24T19:49:03.857+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 876639
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:51:20-06:00
Filename: BMC 15(58) 2014.pdf
Original checksum: ad65813ba818804f47f52b07a29a1880
Copyright note: ??? 2014 Benjaminy and Bubela; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: Abstract
File title: Ocular gene transfer in the spotlight: implications of newspaper content for clinical communications
Page count: 11
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date