Download the full-sized PDF
Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R38C04
This file is in the following communities:
|Renewable Resources, Department of|
This file is in the following collections:
|Journal Articles (Renewable Resources)|
A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis Open Access
- Author or creator
Altaf Arain, M.
- Additional contributors
Global vegetation model
Net ecosystem productivity
- Type of item
- Journal Article (Published)
Accurately simulating gross primary productivity (GPP) in terrestrial ecosystem models is critical because errors in simulated GPP propagate through the model to introduce additional errors in simulated biomass and other fluxes. We evaluated simulated, daily average GPP from 26 models against estimated GPP at 39 eddy covariance flux tower sites across the United States and Canada. None of the models in this study match estimated GPP within observed uncertainty. On average, models overestimate GPP in winter, spring, and fall, and underestimate GPP in summer. Models overpredicted GPP under dry conditions and for temperatures below 0 degrees C. Improvements in simulated soil moisture and ecosystem response to drought or humidity stress will improve simulated GPP under dry conditions. Adding a low-temperature response to shut down GPP for temperatures below 0 degrees C will reduce the positive bias in winter, spring, and fall and improve simulated phenology. The negative bias in summer and poor overall performance resulted from mismatches between simulated and observed light use efficiency (LUE). Improving simulated GPP requires better leaf-to-canopy scaling and better values of model parameters that control the maximum potential GPP, such as epsilon(max) (LUE), V-cmax (unstressed Rubisco catalytic capacity) or Jmax (the maximum electron transport rate).
- Date created
- License information
- © 2012 American Geophysical Union. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
- Citation for previous publication
Schaefer, K., Schwalm, C., Williams, C., Arain, A., Barr, A., Chen, J., Davis, K., Dimitrov, D., Golaz, N., Hilton, T., Hollinger, D., Humphreys, E., Poulter, B., Raczka, B., Richardson, A., Sahoo, A., Thornton, P., Vargas, R., Verbeeck, H., Anderson, R., Baker, I., Baldocchi, D., Black, T.A., Bolstad, P., Chen, J., Curtis, P., Desai, A., Dietze, M., Dragoni, D., Flanagan, L., Grant, R., Gu, L., Katul, G., Kucharik, C., Law, B., Liu, S., Lokipitiya, E., Margolis, H., Matamala, R., McCaughey, H., Monson, R., Munger, J.W., Oechel, W., Peng, C., Price, D., Ricciuto, D., Riley, B., Roulet, N., Tian, H., Tonitto, C., Torn, M., Verma, S. and Weng, E. (2012). A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis. Journal of Geophysical Research - Biogeosciences, 117, G03010. doi: 10.1029/2012/JG001960.
- Link to related item
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 599881
Last modified: 2015:10:12 10:40:50-06:00
Original checksum: b597b0b8ba0e8b952a76e1e43307931e
Well formed: true
File title: A modeldata comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis
Page count: 15