ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesisDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R38C04

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Renewable Resources, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Renewable Resources)

A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Schaefer, K.
Schwalm, C.R.
Williams, C.
Altaf Arain, M.
Barr, A.
Chen, J.M.
Davis, K.J.
Dimitrov, D.
Hilton, T.W.
Hollinger, D.Y.
Humphreys, E.
Poulter, B.
Raczka, B.M.
Richardson, A.D.
Sahoo, A.
Thornton, P.
Vargas, R.
Verbeeck, H.
Anderson, R.
Baker, I.
Black, A.
Bolstad, P.
Chen, J.
Curtis, P.S.
Desai, A.R.
Dietze, M.
Dragoni, D.
Gough, C.
Grant, R.F.
Gu, L.
Jain, A.
Kucharik, C.
Law, B.
Liu, S.
Lokipitiya, E.
Margolis, H.A.
Matamala, R.
McCaughey, J.H.
Monson, R.
Munger, J.W.
Oechel, W.
Peng, C.
Price, D.T.
Ricciuto, D.
Riley, W.J.
Roulet, N.
Tian, H.
Tonitto, C.
Torn, M.
Weng, E.
Zhou, X.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Sub-alpine forest
Boreal forests
Interannual variability
CO2 exchange
Global vegetation model
Stomatal conductance
Net ecosystem productivity
Soil-moisture
Dioxide fluxes
High-elevation
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Accurately simulating gross primary productivity (GPP) in terrestrial ecosystem models is critical because errors in simulated GPP propagate through the model to introduce additional errors in simulated biomass and other fluxes. We evaluated simulated, daily average GPP from 26 models against estimated GPP at 39 eddy covariance flux tower sites across the United States and Canada. None of the models in this study match estimated GPP within observed uncertainty. On average, models overestimate GPP in winter, spring, and fall, and underestimate GPP in summer. Models overpredicted GPP under dry conditions and for temperatures below 0 degrees C. Improvements in simulated soil moisture and ecosystem response to drought or humidity stress will improve simulated GPP under dry conditions. Adding a low-temperature response to shut down GPP for temperatures below 0 degrees C will reduce the positive bias in winter, spring, and fall and improve simulated phenology. The negative bias in summer and poor overall performance resulted from mismatches between simulated and observed light use efficiency (LUE). Improving simulated GPP requires better leaf-to-canopy scaling and better values of model parameters that control the maximum potential GPP, such as epsilon(max) (LUE), V-cmax (unstressed Rubisco catalytic capacity) or Jmax (the maximum electron transport rate).
Date created
2012
DOI
doi:10.7939/R38C04
License information
Rights
© 2012 American Geophysical Union. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
Schaefer, K., Schwalm, C., Williams, C., Arain, A., Barr, A., Chen, J., Davis, K., Dimitrov, D., Golaz, N., Hilton, T., Hollinger, D., Humphreys, E., Poulter, B., Raczka, B., Richardson, A., Sahoo, A., Thornton, P., Vargas, R., Verbeeck, H., Anderson, R., Baker, I., Baldocchi, D., Black, T.A., Bolstad, P., Chen, J., Curtis, P., Desai, A., Dietze, M., Dragoni, D., Flanagan, L., Grant, R., Gu, L., Katul, G., Kucharik, C., Law, B., Liu, S., Lokipitiya, E., Margolis, H., Matamala, R., McCaughey, H., Monson, R., Munger, J.W., Oechel, W., Peng, C., Price, D., Ricciuto, D., Riley, B., Roulet, N., Tian, H., Tonitto, C., Torn, M., Verma, S. and Weng, E. (2012). A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis. Journal of Geophysical Research - Biogeosciences, 117, G03010. doi: 10.1029/2012/JG001960.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-29T16:37:50.282+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 599881
Last modified: 2015:10:12 10:40:50-06:00
Filename: JGRB_117_2012_G03010.pdf
Original checksum: b597b0b8ba0e8b952a76e1e43307931e
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: A modeldata comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis
Page count: 15
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date