ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Life Cycle Assessment and Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costs of Hydrogen Production from Underground Coal GasificationDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3000078V

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Life Cycle Assessment and Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costs of Hydrogen Production from Underground Coal Gasification Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
GHG Emissions
Modeling
GHG abatement costs
Hydrogen Production
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS)
Underground Coal Gasification (UCG)
Energy Analysis
Underground Coal Gasification
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Verma, Aman
Supervisor and department
Kumar, Amit (Department of Mechanical Engineering)
Examining committee member and department
Gupta, Raj (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering)
Lipsett, Mike (Department of Mechanical Engineering)
Department
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Specialization

Date accepted
2014-11-07T15:45:56Z
Graduation date
2015-06
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
Large amounts of hydrogen (H2) are required for the upgrading of bitumen from oil sands to produce synthetic crude oil (SCO). Currently, natural gas is used in the bitumen upgrading industry to produce H2 through steam methane reforming (SMR). This process has a significant life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint. Due to rising SCO production from the Canadian oil sands and climate change concerns, there is a growing need to explore more environmentally sustainable pathways for H2 production that have lower GHG footprint. Western Canada is endowed with considerable reserves of deep un-mineable coal that can be converted to syngas through a gasification process called underground coal gasification (UCG). The syngas can be transformed into H2 through commercially available technologies used in conventional fossil-fuel based H2 production pathways. Moreover, GHGs (mainly CO2) from the H2 plant operation can be captured using a physical solvent like Selexol and sequestered underground or used as a feedstock for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations. A life cycle assessment (LCA) is a useful tool to evaluate the environmental impact of a system. This research presents a model to perform energy balances, estimate H2 conversion efficiency, and implement LCA to quantify life cycle GHG emissions in different unit operations of H2 production from UCG-based syngas with and without carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). In addition, a detailed analysis of the impact of key UCG parameters, i.e., H2O-to-O2 injection ratio, ground water influx, and steam-to-carbon ratio in syngas conversion, is completed on the results. Furthermore, seven practical H2 production scenarios, applicable to western Canada, are considered to assess the GHG abatement costs of implementing UCG vis-à-vis SMR along with the consideration of CCS. The life cycle GHG emissions are calculated to be 0.91 and 18.0 kg-CO2-eq/kg-H2 in a small-scale H2 production (16.3 tonnes/day) from UCG-based syngas with and without CCS, respectively. The heat exchanger efficiency and the separation efficiency of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit are major parameters affecting these emissions. The emissions increase marginally with a rise in the H2O-to-O2 injection ratio and the steam-to-carbon ratio in H2 production from UCG with CCS. Considering SMR technology without CCS as the base case, the GHG abatement costs of implementing the UCG-CCS technology is calculated to be in the range of C$41-109 /tonne-CO2-eq depending on the transportation distance from the UCG-H2 production plant to the CCS site. On the other hand, the GHG abatement costs for SMR-CCS-based scenarios are higher than for UCG-CCS-based scenarios; they range from C$87-158 /tonne-CO2-eq in a similar manner to UCG-CCS. However, there is no GHG abatement for implementing UCG without CCS; the life cycle GHG emissions are higher in UCG than in SMR. The sale of the CO2 captured in the H2 production plant (applicable in SMR-CCS and UCG-CCS) to an EOR operator reduces the GHG abatement costs; in fact, a prospect for revenue generation is realized in the UCG-CCS case.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3000078V
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-06-15T07:00:22.696+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3449480
Last modified: 2015:10:21 23:52:55-06:00
Filename: Verma_Aman_201411_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 9adfe2db01e2460798f87218631c9c6b
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date