ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of A descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published, 1991–2012: Cross sectional study.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3K931D5K

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Health Systems

A descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published, 1991–2012: Cross sectional study. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Saltaji, H.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
systematic reviews
oral medicine
cross-sectional methods
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Objectives To identify all systematic reviews (SRs) published in the domain of oral health research and describe them in terms of their epidemiological and descriptive characteristics. Design Cross sectional, descriptive study. Methods An electronic search of seven databases was performed from inception through May 2012; bibliographies of relevant publications were also reviewed. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were oral health SRs defined as therapeutic or non-therapeutic investigations that studied a topic or an intervention related to dental, oral or craniofacial diseases/disorders. Data were extracted from all the SRs based on a number of epidemiological and descriptive characteristics. Data were analysed descriptively for all the SRs, within each of the nine dental specialities, and for Cochrane and non-Cochrane SRs separately. Results 1,188 oral health (126 Cochrane and 1062 non-Cochrane) SRs published from 1991 through May 2012 were identified, encompassing the nine dental specialties. Over half (n = 676; 56.9%) of the SRs were published in specialty oral health journals, with almost all (n = 1,178; 99.2%) of the SRs published in English and almost none of the non-Cochrane SRs (n = 11; 0.9%) consisting of updates of previously published SRs. 75.3% of the SRs were categorized as therapeutic, with 64.5% examining non-drug interventions, while approximately half (n = 150/294; 51%) of the non-therapeutic SRs were classified as epidemiological SRs. The SRs included a median of 15 studies, with a meta-analysis conducted in 43.6%, in which a median of 9 studies/1 randomized trial were included in the largest meta-analysis conducted. Funding was received for 25.1% of the SRs, including nearly three-quarters (n = 96; 76.2%) of the Cochrane SRs. Conclusion Epidemiological and descriptive characteristics of the 1,188 oral health SRs varied across the nine dental specialties and by SR category (Cochrane vs. non-Cochrane). There is a clear need for more updates of SRs in all the dental specialties.
Date created
2013
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3K931D5K
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication
Saltaji, H., Cummings, G. G., Armijo-Olivo, S., Major, M. P., Amin, M., Major, P. W., Hartling, L., & Flores-Mir, C. (2013). A descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published, 1991–2012: Cross sectional study. Plos ONE, 8(9).
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-04T16:44:14.826+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 974898
Last modified: 2015:10:12 17:50:58-06:00
Filename: PLOS_2013_8_9.pdf
Original checksum: a6708dcd490dafc1560bcc1b7b4e73a4
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=2952
Page count: 12
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date