Download the full-sized PDF
Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3GF0N011
This file is in the following communities:
|Renewable Resources, Department of|
This file is in the following collections:
|Journal Articles (Renewable Resources)|
Forage yield and quality of chicory, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa during the establishment year Open Access
- Author or creator
Bork, E. W.
- Additional contributors
- Type of item
- Journal Article (Published)
As part of a study to evaluate alternative forages for farmed deer, we compared forage yields and quality of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) with that of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in north central Alberta, Canada. Despite similar plant densities among the three species, the foliar cover of chicory averaged 76%, 20% greater than alfalfa and 50% greater than trefoil. Alfalfa had higher plant height, dry matter yields, and crude protein concentrations compared to chicory and trefoil, leading to crude protein yields nearly double that of the other forages. Alfalfa also had superior over-winter persistence. Birdsfoot trefoil stands exhibited poor competitiveness in the year of establishment, as demonstrated by high weed and volunteer clover biomass. Chicory had lower neutral detergent fiber concentrations compared to the other forages, leading to a favorable neutral detergent soluble value of 590 g kg(-1) DM, 6% greater than that of trefoil. In contrast, tannin concentrations were greatest in trefoil (nearly 60 g kg(-1) DM), well above those in the other forages (<20 g kg(-1) DM). These results highlight the potential of chicory for forage production, as well as the importance of mixing alfalfa with alternative forages to optimize forage yield and quality.
- Date created
- License information
- Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported
- Citation for previous publication
Chapman, G; Bork, EW; Donkor, NT; Hudson, RJ. (2008). Forage yield and quality of chicory, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa during the establishment year. The Open Agriculture Journal, 2, 68-74.
- Link to related item
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 233972
Last modified: 2015:10:12 15:33:56-06:00
Original checksum: 4508d3f2cd526bb367f9940139963ca9
Well formed: true
File title: untitled
Page count: 7